Add to ORKGThis article discusses a California case which held that the measure of damages for a broker’s intentional misrepresentation to principal agent is not limited to the buyer’s out-of-pocket losses but may be measured by the benefit-of-the bargain rule
This thesis is an investigation of the law of damages for misrepresentation at common law and under ...
This article discusses a case which held that a mortgage broker’s agreement to indemnify its mortgag...
California Civil Code section 3343 provides that the measure of damages for fraud in a property tran...
This article discusses a California case which held that the measure of damages for a broker’s i...
This article discusses a California decision holding the broker liable to a buyer for misreprese...
This article discusses a California case which held that the buyer’s measure of damages for a se...
This article discusses a California case which held that the buyer’s measure of damages for a se...
While the caveat emptor (buyer beware) theory has traditionally applied to real estate purchases, co...
Part I of this note focuses on the history of the broker\u27s duty of disclosure and duties owed to ...
(Excerpt) While it might be asymmetrical and a bit intellectually troubling that there is no attract...
This article discusses a California case which held that a seller’s real estate agent breached her f...
An old and cardinal rule of contract law requires that expectancy damages for breach of contract put...
While the caveat emptor (buyer beware) theory has traditionally applied to real estate purchases, co...
The reaches of the California Supreme Court decision in Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. have yet to ...
This article discusses a California case which held a provision providing for forfeiture of buye...
This thesis is an investigation of the law of damages for misrepresentation at common law and under ...
This article discusses a case which held that a mortgage broker’s agreement to indemnify its mortgag...
California Civil Code section 3343 provides that the measure of damages for fraud in a property tran...
This article discusses a California case which held that the measure of damages for a broker’s i...
This article discusses a California decision holding the broker liable to a buyer for misreprese...
This article discusses a California case which held that the buyer’s measure of damages for a se...
This article discusses a California case which held that the buyer’s measure of damages for a se...
While the caveat emptor (buyer beware) theory has traditionally applied to real estate purchases, co...
Part I of this note focuses on the history of the broker\u27s duty of disclosure and duties owed to ...
(Excerpt) While it might be asymmetrical and a bit intellectually troubling that there is no attract...
This article discusses a California case which held that a seller’s real estate agent breached her f...
An old and cardinal rule of contract law requires that expectancy damages for breach of contract put...
While the caveat emptor (buyer beware) theory has traditionally applied to real estate purchases, co...
The reaches of the California Supreme Court decision in Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. have yet to ...
This article discusses a California case which held a provision providing for forfeiture of buye...
This thesis is an investigation of the law of damages for misrepresentation at common law and under ...
This article discusses a case which held that a mortgage broker’s agreement to indemnify its mortgag...
California Civil Code section 3343 provides that the measure of damages for fraud in a property tran...