Add to ORKGIn 1976 the Michigan Supreme Court’s determined in Doe v. State that procedural due process requires an owner of a significant interest in real property to be given notice of the state’s foreclosure petition and a meaningful opportunity for a hearing which he may challenge the state’s claim that property taxes remain unpaid without legal justification. This casenote examines the existing legal precedent during the Doe v. State decision, the Michigan Supreme Court’s decision and analysis, and the legislature’s actions following the decision
Summary creditor remedies have come under increasing attack in recent years. The major question has ...
In Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 130 S. Ct. 2592 (...
States have long claimed the right to take custody of presumably abandoned property and hold it for ...
On May 8, 1952, the town of Somers instituted an action to foreclose a number of tax liens. One of t...
Complainant, believing his property to be illegally in the possession of defendant pawnbroker, obtai...
Local governments in the United States still rely on real property taxation as a dominant source of ...
In condemnation proceedings instituted by a city against a landowner, notice of proceedings to deter...
The foreclosure of property tax liens performs an essential economic function by reconnecting underu...
The United States Supreme Court has held that the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment req...
The United States Supreme Court held that Procedural Due Process does not entitle an owner of proper...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that absent exigent circumstances, the Due Process Claus...
An unfortunate amount of semantic confusion currently burdens the constitutional process of balancin...
Plaintiff, a Georgia corporation not qualified to do business in Florida, solicited orders for merch...
When loaning money, lenders often require that obligations be secured by a mortgage on real estate o...
A recent United States Supreme Court decision, Fuentes v. Shevin, and two recent Washington Court of...
Summary creditor remedies have come under increasing attack in recent years. The major question has ...
In Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 130 S. Ct. 2592 (...
States have long claimed the right to take custody of presumably abandoned property and hold it for ...
On May 8, 1952, the town of Somers instituted an action to foreclose a number of tax liens. One of t...
Complainant, believing his property to be illegally in the possession of defendant pawnbroker, obtai...
Local governments in the United States still rely on real property taxation as a dominant source of ...
In condemnation proceedings instituted by a city against a landowner, notice of proceedings to deter...
The foreclosure of property tax liens performs an essential economic function by reconnecting underu...
The United States Supreme Court has held that the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment req...
The United States Supreme Court held that Procedural Due Process does not entitle an owner of proper...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that absent exigent circumstances, the Due Process Claus...
An unfortunate amount of semantic confusion currently burdens the constitutional process of balancin...
Plaintiff, a Georgia corporation not qualified to do business in Florida, solicited orders for merch...
When loaning money, lenders often require that obligations be secured by a mortgage on real estate o...
A recent United States Supreme Court decision, Fuentes v. Shevin, and two recent Washington Court of...
Summary creditor remedies have come under increasing attack in recent years. The major question has ...
In Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 130 S. Ct. 2592 (...
States have long claimed the right to take custody of presumably abandoned property and hold it for ...