Topics
Supreme CourtPlace
civil rightsMusical work
This Article argues that the Supreme Court\u27s recent disparate treatment decisions under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 represent a trend toward unifying all civil rights law under an approach most closely akin to traditional equity. This trend explains the curious tension between substance and process in the Court\u27s most recent decisions, St. Mary\u27s Honor Center v. Hicks and Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing. It also explains the Court\u27s uncommon confidence in its yet undefined notions of what constitutes discrimination on the basis of the several protected categories recognized in Title VII and related statutes. The trend toward equity reveals that the Court regards any precise definition of discrimination “because of th...
In a 2015 case, the Supreme Court held that plaintiffs could bring disparate impact claims under the...
The United States Supreme Court’s discourse on discrimination affects how fundamental civil rights -...
In a 2015 case, the Supreme Court held that plaintiffs could bring disparate impact claims under the...
Has litigation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 reached the limit of its utility in a...
This Article argues that the Supreme Court\u27s recent disparate treatment decisions under Title VII...
(Excerpt) This Article focuses on judicial lawmaking and policymaking in an important area of antidi...
This article is a comprehensive review of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, more specifically, Title VII...
The United States Supreme Court’s discourse on discrimination affects how fundamental civil rights -...
Times change, and when they do, the law must as well. Much of the most important employment discrimi...
In response to the universal belief that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is not fulfilling...
In response to the universal belief that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is not fulfilling...
This Article explains and analyzes a recent trend in the Supreme Court’s cases regarding unintention...
The article discusses Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. It mentions that Title VII focuses on ...
article published in law journalMany of you have seen or heard in the media much discussion about la...
Civil rights are under siege. In mid-1989, the United States Supreme Court decided several cases th...
In a 2015 case, the Supreme Court held that plaintiffs could bring disparate impact claims under the...
The United States Supreme Court’s discourse on discrimination affects how fundamental civil rights -...
In a 2015 case, the Supreme Court held that plaintiffs could bring disparate impact claims under the...
Has litigation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 reached the limit of its utility in a...
This Article argues that the Supreme Court\u27s recent disparate treatment decisions under Title VII...
(Excerpt) This Article focuses on judicial lawmaking and policymaking in an important area of antidi...
This article is a comprehensive review of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, more specifically, Title VII...
The United States Supreme Court’s discourse on discrimination affects how fundamental civil rights -...
Times change, and when they do, the law must as well. Much of the most important employment discrimi...
In response to the universal belief that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is not fulfilling...
In response to the universal belief that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is not fulfilling...
This Article explains and analyzes a recent trend in the Supreme Court’s cases regarding unintention...
The article discusses Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. It mentions that Title VII focuses on ...
article published in law journalMany of you have seen or heard in the media much discussion about la...
Civil rights are under siege. In mid-1989, the United States Supreme Court decided several cases th...
In a 2015 case, the Supreme Court held that plaintiffs could bring disparate impact claims under the...
The United States Supreme Court’s discourse on discrimination affects how fundamental civil rights -...
In a 2015 case, the Supreme Court held that plaintiffs could bring disparate impact claims under the...
Add to ORKG