We describe the evaluation of the registration of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scans with X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) scans of the human brain. A CT scan and a PET scan of the same person were obtained with fiducial markers placed on the person\u27s head. The CT scan and the PET scan were then registered, first by using the fiducial markers, and next by applying the registration method currently under question, completely ignoring fiducial markers. In both cases, the positions of fiducial markers in PET scan and the positions of corresponding fiducial markers in CT scan were compared. The results based on aligning only one patient scans are encouraging, and in the future we hope to obtain more PET and CT scan pairs to validate the ...
Contains fulltext : 51475.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)Multimodality ...
Contains fulltext : 69466.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)AIM: Integrati...
Motivation: There are millions of people which suffer from tumors and their harmful consequences. Al...
We describe the evaluation of the registration of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scans with X-ra...
Spatially registered positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic reso...
Proceeding of: 2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, Lyon, France, October 15 - 20,...
Positron emission tomography (PET) provides important information on tumor biology, but lacks detail...
The original publication can be found at www.springerlink.comFully automatic co-registration of func...
Image registration is an important preprocessing step in neuroimaging which allows for the matching ...
This article assesses the resulting accuracies of 2 registration methods using the same multimodal m...
We propose and compare different registration approaches to align small-animal PET studies and a pro...
Proceeding of: 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS'07), Honolulu, Hawaii, USA...
Aims: To develop clinical protocols for acquiring PET images, performing CT-PET registration and tu...
Aim: Combined whole-body (WB) PET/CT imaging provides better overall co-registration compared to sep...
<p><b>A.</b> PET to PET co-registration accuracy <b>B.</b> CT to PET co-registration accuracy.</p
Contains fulltext : 51475.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)Multimodality ...
Contains fulltext : 69466.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)AIM: Integrati...
Motivation: There are millions of people which suffer from tumors and their harmful consequences. Al...
We describe the evaluation of the registration of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scans with X-ra...
Spatially registered positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic reso...
Proceeding of: 2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, Lyon, France, October 15 - 20,...
Positron emission tomography (PET) provides important information on tumor biology, but lacks detail...
The original publication can be found at www.springerlink.comFully automatic co-registration of func...
Image registration is an important preprocessing step in neuroimaging which allows for the matching ...
This article assesses the resulting accuracies of 2 registration methods using the same multimodal m...
We propose and compare different registration approaches to align small-animal PET studies and a pro...
Proceeding of: 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS'07), Honolulu, Hawaii, USA...
Aims: To develop clinical protocols for acquiring PET images, performing CT-PET registration and tu...
Aim: Combined whole-body (WB) PET/CT imaging provides better overall co-registration compared to sep...
<p><b>A.</b> PET to PET co-registration accuracy <b>B.</b> CT to PET co-registration accuracy.</p
Contains fulltext : 51475.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)Multimodality ...
Contains fulltext : 69466.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)AIM: Integrati...
Motivation: There are millions of people which suffer from tumors and their harmful consequences. Al...