Dialogue and disputation in medieval thought and society, 1050–1350

The dialogue genre experienced widespread popularity in the ancient Greco-Roman world and into the Early Middle Ages, when it was used effectively as a vehicle for expressing an Augustinian meditative spirituality. While several studies have been undertaken concerning the ancient art of dialogue and the Renaissance interest in Greek and Roman dialogues, there has been no adequate attempt to examine or explain the dialogue\u27s popularity during the High Middle Ages, when important cultural and institutional changes in the intellectual landscape of Western Europe allowed the dialogue genre to become a powerful weapon for dispute and polemic. In examining a diversity of sources relative to these intellectual and institutional changes, including dialogues and accounts of disputations, this dissertation argues that the renewed popularity of dialectic during the eleventh and twelfth centuries and the formalization of academic disputations during the thirteenth century are related expressions of a broader phenomenon that can best be described as a culture of disputation. Five developments traceable to the period between 1050 and 1350 in Western Europe collectively embody this culture of disputation: the pedagogical influence of Anselm of Bec, the popularity of dialectic and disputation in the twelfth-century circles of learning, the recovery of Aristotle\u27s New Logic, the institutionalization of disputation as a method of instruction in the Paris university and in Dominican schools, and the application of literary dialogue and public disputation in the Church\u27s engagement with Jews and Judaism. These important developments, as well as other manifestations of the scholastic involvement with dialogue and disputation, such as medieval drama, debate poetry, and polyphonic music, are evidence of a profound transformation in the medieval approach towards learning and faith that warrant being viewed as example of cultural history