Incident cataracts following protracted low-dose occupational ionizing radiation exposures in United States medical radiologic technologists: Statistical methods for exploring heterogeneity of effects and improving causal inference

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. February 2016. Major: Epidemiology. Advisors: Richard MacLehose, Alan Lifson. 1 computer file (PDF); xii, 91 pages.Background: Medical radiologic technologists are routinely exposed to protracted low-dose occupational ionizing radiation. The U.S. Rad Tech (USRT Study) was begun in 1982 by the National Cancer Institute in collaboration with the University of Minnesota School of Public and the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists to investigate potential health risks from occupational ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation exposures have been associated with cataracts, which if left untreated can lead to visual impairment or blindness. Phenotypes of cataracts are characterized by their location in the eye lens and include posterior subcapsular and cortical cataracts (most commonly associated with ionizing radiation), and nuclear cataracts (associated with age). Methods that allow investigators to flexibly examine the extent of heterogeneity across many covariate strata are needed to help characterize the extent of any heterogeneity. One such potential method is boosted regression trees, a machine learning ensemble model that is particularly well suited to prediction while incorporating interactions. As prediction is becoming increasingly important for epidemiologic investigations (causal inference methods commonly require the use of prediction), exploration of the utility of machine learning methods in epidemiology is warranted. Occupational epidemiologic cohort studies are often susceptible to selection bias from the healthy worker survivor effect (HWSE), whereby less healthy individuals leave work and accrue less exposure compared to healthier individuals who stay at work and continue to accrue exposure. As a result, the association between exposure and an outcome may be attenuated, or even reversed in some cases. G-methods are a family of analytical tools that were developed to address situations that may be affected from time-varying confounding and structural bias as seen in the HWSE. One such method, the parametric g-formula, is a rigorous computational model that has been used to correct effects estimates for potential bias from the HWSE. Objective: The overall objective of this research is to explore the relationship between protracted low-dose exposures to occupational ionizing radiation and the risk of cataracts in medical radiologic technologists in the United States and its territories, and to propose methodologic techniques to help estimate causal effects in such settings. The overall objective of this research will be accomplished in three separate manuscripts. Manuscript 1: Aim: To estimate the overall association between protracted exposure to low-dose occupational ionizing radiation and incident cataracts in medical radiologic technologists. Methods: Cox regression models were used to model time to cataract predicted by ionizing radiation. Technologists were followed from year first worked as a radiologic technologist starting at age 18 or older, until report of cataracts or administrative censoring at the third survey. Results: After adjustment for birth year, sex, and race / ethnicity (N=69,798), ionizing radiation was significantly associated with increased hazard of cataracts with a time-varying effect (p 25) at baseline. Those who were youngest and those without macular degeneration conversely had lower risk differences compared to the average. Manuscript 3: Aim: Use the parametric G-formula to adjust effect estimates for the healthy worker survivor effect in the estimated risk of incident radiogenic cataracts in medical radiologic technologists. Methods: The parametric g-formula was used to estimate cataract risks under different hypothetical scenarios limiting badge dose in five-year periods to the 80th percentile (badge dose ≤ 18.38 mSv), 60th percentile (badge dose ≤ 9.06 mSv), 40th percentile (badge dose ≤ 4.47 mSv), and 20th percentile (badge dose ≤ 2.08 mSv) of observed dose, and a 5-mSv reduction in dose estimates in each period over follow-up (N=69,798). Cumulative incidence risks and risks conditional on survival of cataracts from these treatment regimes were compared to the status quo (no intervention of dose) with risk differences and 95% confidence intervals. Substantively important differences in both cumulative incidence of cataracts and conditional risks of cataracts between the natural course and treatment regimes were found. There was evidence that decreasing the dose of radiation exposure could reduce the risk of cataracts, even at relatively early ages. Conclusion: Overall, our results indicate that low-dose occupational ionizing radiation exposures elevate the risks of cataracts in medical radiologic technologists in the USRT Study, as our three manuscripts found significant associations between occupational ionizing radiation and cataract risks. Additionally, methods were proposed to explore heterogeneity of effects and improve the causal interpretation of effect estimates in the association between ionizing radiation and cataracts. Validation of cataracts is warranted and future studies would benefit from information regarding phenotypes of cataracts