Add to ORKG"The second flight (51) was a follow up for the first flight that had increased allowable settling times. The data shows that the controller is responding in the correct manner, but it does not seem to be tracking very accurately. Future flight tests will be required to validate the inner loops of this controller. The software used for this flight was branches/WayPointTrack/Software/FlightCode rev 857. Flight 51 was conducted in the same manner of flight 50, but has longer allowable settling times for the tracker. Thor Flight 51 Rx data: A024, L022, F000, H000
Thor flight 58 was conducted in the same manner as 57, but the airplane was flown randomly, away fro...
The controller used for flight 23 was the baseline controller. For 24 and 25 it was the composite st...
Thor Flight 19: Waypoint tracker; Engaged multiple times, but the tracker appeared to have difficult...
The first flight (50) was for testing Will's heading tracker with Thor which consisted of 180 degree...
Flight 52 was conducted to test a guidance algorithm where the pilot commands a heading rate which i...
"The second and third (42 and 43) flights were used to test the waypoint tracker controller. We had ...
The second and third (42 and 43) flights were used to test the waypoint tracker controller. We had d...
Flight 49 was a follow up to the previous flight. It consisted of five straight & level extended tim...
The first flight (47) was for Will's baseline controller validation with Thor using varying doublet ...
Flight 46 was used to test the baseline controller that Will designed. It consisted of a four second...
Thor flight 61 tested the psi tracker performance. The test included 180 degree turns, and rectangul...
After viewing data from the first flight, it was observed that there was some discrepancy in the dut...
Thor flight 59 was a series of maneuvers conducted using the baseline controller to compare to the n...
The controller used for flight 23 was the baseline controller. For 24 and 25 it was the composite st...
Date: 10/11/11 Location: ACRC Aircraft: Thor Pilot: James Rosenthal Flights: 3 Thor Weather Sunny, m...
Thor flight 58 was conducted in the same manner as 57, but the airplane was flown randomly, away fro...
The controller used for flight 23 was the baseline controller. For 24 and 25 it was the composite st...
Thor Flight 19: Waypoint tracker; Engaged multiple times, but the tracker appeared to have difficult...
The first flight (50) was for testing Will's heading tracker with Thor which consisted of 180 degree...
Flight 52 was conducted to test a guidance algorithm where the pilot commands a heading rate which i...
"The second and third (42 and 43) flights were used to test the waypoint tracker controller. We had ...
The second and third (42 and 43) flights were used to test the waypoint tracker controller. We had d...
Flight 49 was a follow up to the previous flight. It consisted of five straight & level extended tim...
The first flight (47) was for Will's baseline controller validation with Thor using varying doublet ...
Flight 46 was used to test the baseline controller that Will designed. It consisted of a four second...
Thor flight 61 tested the psi tracker performance. The test included 180 degree turns, and rectangul...
After viewing data from the first flight, it was observed that there was some discrepancy in the dut...
Thor flight 59 was a series of maneuvers conducted using the baseline controller to compare to the n...
The controller used for flight 23 was the baseline controller. For 24 and 25 it was the composite st...
Date: 10/11/11 Location: ACRC Aircraft: Thor Pilot: James Rosenthal Flights: 3 Thor Weather Sunny, m...
Thor flight 58 was conducted in the same manner as 57, but the airplane was flown randomly, away fro...
The controller used for flight 23 was the baseline controller. For 24 and 25 it was the composite st...
Thor Flight 19: Waypoint tracker; Engaged multiple times, but the tracker appeared to have difficult...