This study, initiated 11 years after the release of the Generic Environmental Impact Statement findings and recommendations, serves to assess the accuracy of the original GEIS projections for statewide timber harvesting intensity and its associated impacts, as well as the level of implementation of the various mitigation strategies. The purpose is to assess the ability to predict future forest resource conditions and to describe the status of mitigations in the form of forest management practices relative to the GEIS recommendations
98 pagesThe dominant characteristic of Itasca County and, indeed, most areas in northeastern Minnes...
Graduation date: 1982The objective of this study was to measure the consequences of alternative\ud f...
Timber output, the major commodity use of the National Forests, was tracked from 1981 to 1993, to as...
One key recommendation of the 2007 Governor’s Task Force on the Competitiveness of Minnesota’s Pri...
This paper provides a review and evaluation of Minnesota’s experience with environmental review of ...
This paper describes the advantages of having a timber harvesting generic environmental impact state...
The report provides insight into several issues related to the costs of applying forest management g...
A report of study conducted to determine the extent to which forest landowners incur additional fina...
State forestry departments provide a broad range of services to their states, including wildfire p...
This Technical Paper assesses the impact of timber harvesting and forest management on biodiversity,...
Analyses were developed to help support the forest planning effort of the Koochiching County Land ...
The amount of biomass stored in forest ecosystems is a result of past natural disturbances, forest m...
Direct impact of harvesting operations is examined as one segment in a survey of interrelationships ...
This study assesses the net financial consequences to Minnesota timber harvesters of applying best m...
The socioeconomic monitoring report addresses two evaluation questions posed in the Northwest Forest...
98 pagesThe dominant characteristic of Itasca County and, indeed, most areas in northeastern Minnes...
Graduation date: 1982The objective of this study was to measure the consequences of alternative\ud f...
Timber output, the major commodity use of the National Forests, was tracked from 1981 to 1993, to as...
One key recommendation of the 2007 Governor’s Task Force on the Competitiveness of Minnesota’s Pri...
This paper provides a review and evaluation of Minnesota’s experience with environmental review of ...
This paper describes the advantages of having a timber harvesting generic environmental impact state...
The report provides insight into several issues related to the costs of applying forest management g...
A report of study conducted to determine the extent to which forest landowners incur additional fina...
State forestry departments provide a broad range of services to their states, including wildfire p...
This Technical Paper assesses the impact of timber harvesting and forest management on biodiversity,...
Analyses were developed to help support the forest planning effort of the Koochiching County Land ...
The amount of biomass stored in forest ecosystems is a result of past natural disturbances, forest m...
Direct impact of harvesting operations is examined as one segment in a survey of interrelationships ...
This study assesses the net financial consequences to Minnesota timber harvesters of applying best m...
The socioeconomic monitoring report addresses two evaluation questions posed in the Northwest Forest...
98 pagesThe dominant characteristic of Itasca County and, indeed, most areas in northeastern Minnes...
Graduation date: 1982The objective of this study was to measure the consequences of alternative\ud f...
Timber output, the major commodity use of the National Forests, was tracked from 1981 to 1993, to as...