This chapter describes and critiques methods for evaluating the performance of markers to predict risk of a current or future clinical outcome. We consider three criteria that are important for evaluating a risk model: calibration, benefit for decision making and accurate classification. We also describe and discuss a variety of summary measures in common use for quantifying predictive information such as the area under the ROC curve and R-squared. The roles and problems with recently proposed risk reclassification approaches are discussed in detail
Thorough validation is pivotal for any prediction model before it can be advocated for use in medica...
Thorough validation is pivotal for any prediction model before it can be advocated for use in medica...
Consider a continuous marker for predicting a binary outcome. For example, serum concentration of pr...
There are two popular statistical approaches to biomarker evaluation. One models the risk of disea...
There are two popular statistical approaches to biomarker evaluation. One models the risk of disease...
Predicting an individual’s risk of a bad outcome is a key component of medical deci-sionmaking. For ...
The predictive capacity of a marker in a population can be described using the population distributi...
textabstractThe performance of prediction models can be assessed using a variety of methods and metr...
Risk prediction models have been developed in many contexts to classify individuals according to a s...
The performance of a well calibrated risk model, Risk(Y)=P(D=1|Y), can be characterized by the popul...
Consider a set of baseline predictors X to predict a binary outcome D and let Y be a novel marker o...
Prediction models are becoming more and more important in medicine and cardiology. Nowadays, specifi...
The performance of prediction models can be assessed using a variety of methods and metrics. Traditi...
Background and objectives: Prognostic models are, among other things, used to provide risk predictio...
Risk prediction models have been developed in many contexts to classify individuals according to a s...
Thorough validation is pivotal for any prediction model before it can be advocated for use in medica...
Thorough validation is pivotal for any prediction model before it can be advocated for use in medica...
Consider a continuous marker for predicting a binary outcome. For example, serum concentration of pr...
There are two popular statistical approaches to biomarker evaluation. One models the risk of disea...
There are two popular statistical approaches to biomarker evaluation. One models the risk of disease...
Predicting an individual’s risk of a bad outcome is a key component of medical deci-sionmaking. For ...
The predictive capacity of a marker in a population can be described using the population distributi...
textabstractThe performance of prediction models can be assessed using a variety of methods and metr...
Risk prediction models have been developed in many contexts to classify individuals according to a s...
The performance of a well calibrated risk model, Risk(Y)=P(D=1|Y), can be characterized by the popul...
Consider a set of baseline predictors X to predict a binary outcome D and let Y be a novel marker o...
Prediction models are becoming more and more important in medicine and cardiology. Nowadays, specifi...
The performance of prediction models can be assessed using a variety of methods and metrics. Traditi...
Background and objectives: Prognostic models are, among other things, used to provide risk predictio...
Risk prediction models have been developed in many contexts to classify individuals according to a s...
Thorough validation is pivotal for any prediction model before it can be advocated for use in medica...
Thorough validation is pivotal for any prediction model before it can be advocated for use in medica...
Consider a continuous marker for predicting a binary outcome. For example, serum concentration of pr...