World Wide Views on Global Warming was the first ever global-scale citizen deliberation process, held on 25-26 September 2009 and involving approximately 4,000 citizens in 38 countries. WWViews sought to provide citizens with a voice in the 2009 UN Climate Summit in Copenhagen (COP15) by engaging them in a deliberative process about global political positions on climate change. The process produced clear, comparable results across all participating countries that were given to COP15 negotiators. The Danish Government agencies, the Danish Board of Technology and the Danish Cultural Institute, initiated the global process. Organisers in each participating country ran events using the same standardised process. The University of Technology Syd...
The challenges of global climate change are both too deep and too urgent for the international polit...
Australians are amongst the highest per capita emitters of carbon on Earth. The evidence is now clea...
© 2015, © 2015 Taylor & Francis. A systemic approach to deliberative democracy de-emphasises the rol...
World Wide Views on Global Warming was the first ever global-scale citizen deliberation pro-cess, he...
On 26 September 2009, approximately 4,000 citizens in 38 countries participated in World Wide Views ...
On 26 September 2009, approximately 4,000 citizens in 38 countries participated in World Wide Views ...
Citizens well informed about climate change make for better polling, argue Alison Atherton and Rebec...
This report presents a few highlights from the results of World Wide Views on Global Warming (WWView...
The Australian World Wide Views on Global Warming Event, where 105 people from all walks of life cam...
Det globale arrangement World Wide Views on Global Warming (WWViews) var et innovativt eksperiment m...
The integrated wisdom of mainstream science and mainstream economics identifies risks to established...
Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy 2011"World Wide Views on Global Warming involve...
In December 2009, State Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change' ('UNFC...
The Global Assembly on the Climate and Ecological Emergency was a pioneering civil society-led initi...
The global response to climate change depends on you… and everyone else. The decisions we make, for ...
The challenges of global climate change are both too deep and too urgent for the international polit...
Australians are amongst the highest per capita emitters of carbon on Earth. The evidence is now clea...
© 2015, © 2015 Taylor & Francis. A systemic approach to deliberative democracy de-emphasises the rol...
World Wide Views on Global Warming was the first ever global-scale citizen deliberation pro-cess, he...
On 26 September 2009, approximately 4,000 citizens in 38 countries participated in World Wide Views ...
On 26 September 2009, approximately 4,000 citizens in 38 countries participated in World Wide Views ...
Citizens well informed about climate change make for better polling, argue Alison Atherton and Rebec...
This report presents a few highlights from the results of World Wide Views on Global Warming (WWView...
The Australian World Wide Views on Global Warming Event, where 105 people from all walks of life cam...
Det globale arrangement World Wide Views on Global Warming (WWViews) var et innovativt eksperiment m...
The integrated wisdom of mainstream science and mainstream economics identifies risks to established...
Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy 2011"World Wide Views on Global Warming involve...
In December 2009, State Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change' ('UNFC...
The Global Assembly on the Climate and Ecological Emergency was a pioneering civil society-led initi...
The global response to climate change depends on you… and everyone else. The decisions we make, for ...
The challenges of global climate change are both too deep and too urgent for the international polit...
Australians are amongst the highest per capita emitters of carbon on Earth. The evidence is now clea...
© 2015, © 2015 Taylor & Francis. A systemic approach to deliberative democracy de-emphasises the rol...