We provide a comprehensive but critical review of research on applicant reactions to selection procedures published since 2000 (n = 145), when the last major review article on applicant reactions appeared in the Journal of Management. We start by addressing the main criticisms levied against the field to determine whether applicant reactions matter to individuals and employers (“So what?”). This is followed by a consideration of “What’s new?” by conducting a comprehensive and detailed review of applicant reaction research centered upon four areas of growth: expansion of the theoretical lens, incorporation of new technology in the selection arena, internationalization of applicant reactions research, and emerging boundary conditions. Our fin...
Since the 1980's, scientific interest in applicants' reactions to admission procedures has been grow...
While extant research on recruiting has highlighted a number of applicant attitudes that predict fut...
In four studies, applicants’ (N = 478) organizational attractiveness perceptions and recommendation ...
YesWe provide a comprehensive but critical review of research on applicant reactions to selection pr...
We provide a comprehensive but critical review of research on applicant reactions to selection proce...
We provide a comprehensive but critical review of research on applicant reactions to selection proce...
We provide a comprehensive but critical review of research on applicant reactions to selection proce...
In the present special issue new theoretical and empirical insights on applicant perceptions of sele...
[Excerpt] An updated theoretical model of applicant reactions to selection procedures is proposed an...
This paper reports a comprehensive quantitative summary into applicant reactions to popular methods ...
applicant perceptions of selection procedures. We organize our review around several key questions: ...
applicant perceptions of selection procedures. We organize our review around several key questions: ...
Traditionally, personnel selection has been studied from two perspectives. The first perspective mai...
Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: An Updated Model and Meta-Analysis [Excerpt] An updated...
A main aim of this doctoral research was to examine job applicant reactions towards online testing, ...
Since the 1980's, scientific interest in applicants' reactions to admission procedures has been grow...
While extant research on recruiting has highlighted a number of applicant attitudes that predict fut...
In four studies, applicants’ (N = 478) organizational attractiveness perceptions and recommendation ...
YesWe provide a comprehensive but critical review of research on applicant reactions to selection pr...
We provide a comprehensive but critical review of research on applicant reactions to selection proce...
We provide a comprehensive but critical review of research on applicant reactions to selection proce...
We provide a comprehensive but critical review of research on applicant reactions to selection proce...
In the present special issue new theoretical and empirical insights on applicant perceptions of sele...
[Excerpt] An updated theoretical model of applicant reactions to selection procedures is proposed an...
This paper reports a comprehensive quantitative summary into applicant reactions to popular methods ...
applicant perceptions of selection procedures. We organize our review around several key questions: ...
applicant perceptions of selection procedures. We organize our review around several key questions: ...
Traditionally, personnel selection has been studied from two perspectives. The first perspective mai...
Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: An Updated Model and Meta-Analysis [Excerpt] An updated...
A main aim of this doctoral research was to examine job applicant reactions towards online testing, ...
Since the 1980's, scientific interest in applicants' reactions to admission procedures has been grow...
While extant research on recruiting has highlighted a number of applicant attitudes that predict fut...
In four studies, applicants’ (N = 478) organizational attractiveness perceptions and recommendation ...