This paper examines the existence and magnitude of network effects in the matching of work teams. We study the formation of co-author relations among economists over a thirty year period. Our principal finding is that a collaboration emerges faster among two authors if they are closer in the social network of economists. This proximity effect on collaboration is strong and robust but only affects initial collaboration. It has no positive influence on subsequent co-authorship. We also provide some evidence that matching depends on experience, junior authors being more likely to collaborate with senior authors
This paper focuses on the properties of the matching process which leads to scientific collaboration...
Scientific collaboration is one of the key factors to trigger innovations. Coauthorship networks hav...
We analyze economics PhDs’ collaborations in peer-reviewed journals from 1990 to 2014 and investigat...
This paper examines the existence and magnitude of network effects in the matching of workteams. We ...
This paper examines the existence and magnitude of network e¤ects in the matching of workteams. We s...
Using a database of all published articles in economic journals over the last 30 years, we investiga...
The matching of individuals in teams is a key element in the functioning of an economy. The network ...
Increased specialization and extensive collaboration are common behaviours in the scientific communi...
Increased specialization and extensive collaboration are common behaviours in the scientific communi...
When preparing a research article, Economists receive feedback from other academics, present on conf...
Background: The analysis of co-authorship network aims at exploring the impact of network structure ...
We study the impact of research collaborations in coauthorship networks on total research output. Th...
This paper focuses on the properties of the matching process which leads to scientific collaboration...
In recent decades, co-authorship and policies aimed at inducing academic collaboration have increase...
Increased specialization and extensive collaboration are common behaviours in the scientific communi...
This paper focuses on the properties of the matching process which leads to scientific collaboration...
Scientific collaboration is one of the key factors to trigger innovations. Coauthorship networks hav...
We analyze economics PhDs’ collaborations in peer-reviewed journals from 1990 to 2014 and investigat...
This paper examines the existence and magnitude of network effects in the matching of workteams. We ...
This paper examines the existence and magnitude of network e¤ects in the matching of workteams. We s...
Using a database of all published articles in economic journals over the last 30 years, we investiga...
The matching of individuals in teams is a key element in the functioning of an economy. The network ...
Increased specialization and extensive collaboration are common behaviours in the scientific communi...
Increased specialization and extensive collaboration are common behaviours in the scientific communi...
When preparing a research article, Economists receive feedback from other academics, present on conf...
Background: The analysis of co-authorship network aims at exploring the impact of network structure ...
We study the impact of research collaborations in coauthorship networks on total research output. Th...
This paper focuses on the properties of the matching process which leads to scientific collaboration...
In recent decades, co-authorship and policies aimed at inducing academic collaboration have increase...
Increased specialization and extensive collaboration are common behaviours in the scientific communi...
This paper focuses on the properties of the matching process which leads to scientific collaboration...
Scientific collaboration is one of the key factors to trigger innovations. Coauthorship networks hav...
We analyze economics PhDs’ collaborations in peer-reviewed journals from 1990 to 2014 and investigat...