WHY IS ARBITRATION NOT ALWAYS THE MOST EFFICIENT DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHOD

Arbitražno reševanje sporov ima sicer res kar nekaj prednosti pred rednim sodnim postopkom reševanja sporov, a vendar ima tudi pasti, na katere je potrebno posebej opozoriti, saj kljub temu, da je redni sodni postopek počasen in na trenutke neprilagojen novim trendom in času, tudi arbitraža ni vedno boljša izbira sredstva za reševanje medsebojnih sporov. Navedeno velja predvsem, če izpostavimo še neenakost strank, ki se znajdeta v sporu, saj je na arbitražo, kot avtonomno reševanje sporov, z veliko avtonomije strank, mogoče vplivati tako s finančno močjo kot tudi politično močjo predvsem pa z močjo vsiljevanja pogodbenih pogojev.Arbitration does indeed have some advantages over the ordinary judicial dispute settlement procedures, yet it also has pitfalls which must be specially noted, because despite the fact that the ordinary court process is slow and at times adjusted to the new trends and times, including arbitration not always the best choice of the means to resolve conflicts. This applies especially if subjected to inequality customers who find themselves in dispute, with arbitration as an autonomous settlement of disputes, with a lot of autonomy of the parties it can be influenced both by the financial strength and political power in particular, with the power to impose contract terms