FILLING OF CLASSIC LEGAL GAPS IN CASE LAW

Pravne praznine so tista družbena razmerja, ki bi morala biti pravno urejena, pa niso. Naloga sodišč je, da jih zapolnijo. Prvi korak, ki sodiščem predstavlja večni problem in dilemo, je postopek ugotavljanja, ali sploh gre za pravno relevanten primer. Kadar sodišča uredijo primer, kjer je uporaba analogije prepovedana, lahko pride do zlorab in kršitev človekovih pravic. Diplomsko delo se v prvem delu dotika vprašanj različnih vrst pravnih praznin in njihovega prepoznavanja ter zapolnjevanja in tematiko približa bralcu na preprost in razumljiv način. Na kratko so predstavljene glavne metode zapolnjevanja, ki so predvsem pomembne na civilnopravnem področju in nekaterih področjih javnega prava, kjer veljajo stroge omejitve. Drugi del diplomskega dela je namenjen klasičnim pravnim prazninam. Dodani so primeri iz sodne prakse, na podlagi katerih je poudarjen način njihovega zapolnjevanja, tj. z analogijama legis in iuris. Pomembno vprašanje, na katerega se je avtorica med drugim osredotočila, je, ali se pravna analogija oz. analogija iuris dejansko pojavlja tudi v praksi ali pa je zgolj neka teoretična možnost zapolnjevanja, ki je sodišča ne uporabljajo.Legal gaps are the social relations which should be legally regulated, but they are not. The courts task is to fill off such gaps. A constant problem and dilemma for courts is the first step, which is the process of establishing, whether the case is legally relevant. When courts are arranging a case, where the use of analogy is forbidden, misuse and violation of human rights may occur. The first part of the diploma paper is dealing with the issues of different types of legal gaps and their recognition and filling off as well as introducing it to the reader in an easy and understandable manner. There is a short description of main methods of filling off, which are especially important in the civil area and some areas of the public law with severe restrictions. The second part of the diploma paper is dealing with classic legal gaps. There are added cases from case law, on the basis of which the manner of their filling off is pointed out, i.e. with analogies legis and iuris. The author also focused on another important question, namely if the legal analogy or the analogy iuris appears also in praxis or is it just a theoretical filling off possibility, not used by the court