As the UK has placed some of its Prevent strategy on a statutory footing and is proposing to introduce a Counter-Extremism Bill, this article argues that a legal definition of extremism must be carefully drafted to provide legal certainty. The main recommendation is that all forms of violent and non-violent extremism comes under the definition, ensuring it is differentiated from activism. Activism may hold radical views counter to the mainstream opinion, but it is required in liberal democracies as it encourages healthy debate and can prevent the policing of thought in any government strategy or legislation
The United Kingdom’s Prevent Strategy is a unique government response to the threat of domestic terr...
This article describes how disrupting the activities of suspected violent extremists has become an i...
This article examines the implementation of the UK's ‘Prevent Strategy’ for countering terrorist ris...
As the United Kingdom has placed some of its Prevent strategy on a statutory footing and is proposin...
As the UK has placed some of its Prevent strategy on a statutory footing and is proposing to introdu...
While this article’s main focus is on the UK’s Prevent strategy, it includes a comparative study wit...
This article situates the debate on the United Kingdom’s Prevent policy in the broader framework of ...
This is the author accepted manuscript. the final version is available via Westlaw UKThe past decade...
In recent years, both academics and politicians alike have struggled to develop a coherent strategy ...
The British government’s controversial counter-terrorism strategies and policies have come under fie...
This paper explores why the Prevent strand of the UK Government’s counter-terrorism strategy, CONTES...
In response to the threat of terrorism and radicalisation, the UK government introduced the countert...
In recent years, the extreme right wing (XRW) has undergone significant and rapid change to the exte...
De-radicalisation policy carries with it an inherent tension: those who provide the most invaluable ...
De-radicalisation policy carries with it an inherent tension: those who provide the most invaluable ...
The United Kingdom’s Prevent Strategy is a unique government response to the threat of domestic terr...
This article describes how disrupting the activities of suspected violent extremists has become an i...
This article examines the implementation of the UK's ‘Prevent Strategy’ for countering terrorist ris...
As the United Kingdom has placed some of its Prevent strategy on a statutory footing and is proposin...
As the UK has placed some of its Prevent strategy on a statutory footing and is proposing to introdu...
While this article’s main focus is on the UK’s Prevent strategy, it includes a comparative study wit...
This article situates the debate on the United Kingdom’s Prevent policy in the broader framework of ...
This is the author accepted manuscript. the final version is available via Westlaw UKThe past decade...
In recent years, both academics and politicians alike have struggled to develop a coherent strategy ...
The British government’s controversial counter-terrorism strategies and policies have come under fie...
This paper explores why the Prevent strand of the UK Government’s counter-terrorism strategy, CONTES...
In response to the threat of terrorism and radicalisation, the UK government introduced the countert...
In recent years, the extreme right wing (XRW) has undergone significant and rapid change to the exte...
De-radicalisation policy carries with it an inherent tension: those who provide the most invaluable ...
De-radicalisation policy carries with it an inherent tension: those who provide the most invaluable ...
The United Kingdom’s Prevent Strategy is a unique government response to the threat of domestic terr...
This article describes how disrupting the activities of suspected violent extremists has become an i...
This article examines the implementation of the UK's ‘Prevent Strategy’ for countering terrorist ris...