A comparison of the subjective oral health status of older adults from deprived and affluent communities

A comparative study of the subjective oral health status of 60-65-year-old residents was undertaken in two Liverpool electoral wards, Vauxhall, the most deprived, and Woolton, the most affluent in the city. The measuring instrument used was the Subjective Oral Health Status Indicators (SOHSI) questionnaire devised by Locker. The questionnaire was administered by post to random samples of 250 residents from each ward. The main aim of the study was to compare the reported impact of oral conditions on the lives of individuals living in deprived and affluent communities. Responses of 59.6% for the deprived ward and 77.7% for the affluent ward were achieved. The literature suggested that significant differences could be expected between the wards in the reporting of subjective impact. However, significantly greater impact for only one functional sub-scale and one psycho-social sub-scale was reported by residents from the deprived ward. Further analysis of the relationship between impact and sociodemographic variables revealed a strong association between self-reported general health status and the subjective oral health indicators. Finally, a stepwise regression analysis found that pain and chewing problems were the only significant predictors of psycho-social impact. This finding confirms that the individual's socio-economic circumstances are of secondary importance to pain and functional problems in determining the psycho-social effects of oral conditions, as predicted by the conceptual model on which the measuring instrument is based. © Munksgaard, 1997