Add to ORKGThe author points up the decline of caveat emptor as a viable doctrine governing the sale of new homes and analyzes the emergence of implied warranty as a remedy for both structural deficiencies and personal injuries. He argues that the concept of implied warranty tends to obfuscate real distinctions between the builder-vendor’s responsibility for the material integrity of a new home and for personal injuries occasioned by defects therein, concluding that legislation is needed to reestablish a system of order in the law
Washington\u27s implied warranty of habitability doctrine is a creature of public policy. Its applic...
This comment examines the status in Washington of the implied warranty of habitability as applied to...
In Ohio, home buyers have several means available to protect their investment and assure themselves ...
The author points up the decline of caveat emptor as a viable doctrine governing the sale of new hom...
The majority of states other than Ohio have rejected the caveat emptor doctrine and adopted an impli...
The position of the American courts regarding the matter of the liability of a builder-vendor for hi...
Protection against latent defects exists for the purchaser of a forty-nine cent ball point pen under...
Years ago, caveat emptor was the rule in real estate transactions. A home buyer\u27s own inspection ...
Although the application of an implied warranty of quality is now widespread in the sale of new home...
While the caveat emptor (buyer beware) theory has traditionally applied to real estate purchases, co...
In this article, I show how a coherent legal narrative must capture the revolution\u27s radical poli...
“The trend towards greater consumer protection so evident in the products liability field is clearly...
This article will present the different positions that courts have taken during these recent years o...
This article discusses a California case where the landlord was held liable for property damage ...
Defendant, a mass-developer who planned communities and sold homes on the basis of advertised models...
Washington\u27s implied warranty of habitability doctrine is a creature of public policy. Its applic...
This comment examines the status in Washington of the implied warranty of habitability as applied to...
In Ohio, home buyers have several means available to protect their investment and assure themselves ...
The author points up the decline of caveat emptor as a viable doctrine governing the sale of new hom...
The majority of states other than Ohio have rejected the caveat emptor doctrine and adopted an impli...
The position of the American courts regarding the matter of the liability of a builder-vendor for hi...
Protection against latent defects exists for the purchaser of a forty-nine cent ball point pen under...
Years ago, caveat emptor was the rule in real estate transactions. A home buyer\u27s own inspection ...
Although the application of an implied warranty of quality is now widespread in the sale of new home...
While the caveat emptor (buyer beware) theory has traditionally applied to real estate purchases, co...
In this article, I show how a coherent legal narrative must capture the revolution\u27s radical poli...
“The trend towards greater consumer protection so evident in the products liability field is clearly...
This article will present the different positions that courts have taken during these recent years o...
This article discusses a California case where the landlord was held liable for property damage ...
Defendant, a mass-developer who planned communities and sold homes on the basis of advertised models...
Washington\u27s implied warranty of habitability doctrine is a creature of public policy. Its applic...
This comment examines the status in Washington of the implied warranty of habitability as applied to...
In Ohio, home buyers have several means available to protect their investment and assure themselves ...