This exploratory essay is an admixture of amateur psychology, moral theory, and jurisprudence. It grows out of seminars I have given for judges, and reflects that focus. Co-theorists will now see some of what I have been telling practitioners. And error in my story may be exposed. But one can have no qualms about this. It is especially important to have things put right for judges
That the judge\u27s task is to find the law, not to make it, was once a commonplace of our legal cul...
This study empirically tests the proposition that law students adopt different conceptions of the ju...
We should begin with a confession of ignorance. We have no jurisprudence of legal scholarship. Schol...
This exploratory essay is an admixture of amateur psychology, moral theory, and jurisprudence. It gr...
Articles limning the law pertaining to judicial notice are legion, and the footnotes which have been...
We should begin with a confession of ignorance. We have no jurisprudence of legal scholarship. Schol...
Law has been a borrower but not a supplier. Law schools, in effect, have been located on one-way str...
Much has been written about theory and practice in the law, and the tension between practitioners an...
From the introduction: As legal theorists, we live in an age of self-conscious repetition: everythin...
The author describes the common law as a machine, with judges and lawyers as its working parts. He...
I draw a distinction in the beginning of this essay between judicial decision-making and a judge\u27...
After considering the side road of critical legal studies, I shall try to indicate the major signpos...
Judge Edwards divides scholarship into the theoretical and the practical, and, while conceding the p...
The present discussion, while intended to be intrinsically completeso far as intelligent and conveni...
An essay of only five short paragraphs published several years ago by the noted Harvard paleontologi...
That the judge\u27s task is to find the law, not to make it, was once a commonplace of our legal cul...
This study empirically tests the proposition that law students adopt different conceptions of the ju...
We should begin with a confession of ignorance. We have no jurisprudence of legal scholarship. Schol...
This exploratory essay is an admixture of amateur psychology, moral theory, and jurisprudence. It gr...
Articles limning the law pertaining to judicial notice are legion, and the footnotes which have been...
We should begin with a confession of ignorance. We have no jurisprudence of legal scholarship. Schol...
Law has been a borrower but not a supplier. Law schools, in effect, have been located on one-way str...
Much has been written about theory and practice in the law, and the tension between practitioners an...
From the introduction: As legal theorists, we live in an age of self-conscious repetition: everythin...
The author describes the common law as a machine, with judges and lawyers as its working parts. He...
I draw a distinction in the beginning of this essay between judicial decision-making and a judge\u27...
After considering the side road of critical legal studies, I shall try to indicate the major signpos...
Judge Edwards divides scholarship into the theoretical and the practical, and, while conceding the p...
The present discussion, while intended to be intrinsically completeso far as intelligent and conveni...
An essay of only five short paragraphs published several years ago by the noted Harvard paleontologi...
That the judge\u27s task is to find the law, not to make it, was once a commonplace of our legal cul...
This study empirically tests the proposition that law students adopt different conceptions of the ju...
We should begin with a confession of ignorance. We have no jurisprudence of legal scholarship. Schol...