Add to ORKGA recent study of appellate outcomes reveals that defendants succeed significantly more often than plaintiffs on appeal from civil trials-especially from jury trials
Despite what Priest-Klein theory predicts, in earlier research on federal civil cases, Eisenberg fou...
U.S. Juries Grow Tougher on Plaintiffs in Lawsuits, the New York Times page-one headline reads. The...
Professor Shaffer maintains that the preservation of fair trial in civil cases requires an increased...
A recent study of appellate outcomes reveals that defendants succeed significantly more often than p...
In a recent set of articles, Professor Kevin Clermont and Professor Theodore Eisenberg advance the c...
Federal data sets covering district court and appellate court civil cases for cases terminating in f...
Prior federal and state civil appeals studies show that appeals courts overturn jury verdicts more t...
Multiple studies find that plaintiffs who lose at trial and subsequently appeal are less successful ...
Multiple studies find that plaintiffs who lose at trial and subsequently appeal are less successful ...
Professors Clermont and Eisenberg conducted a systematic analysis of appellate court behavior and re...
Prior federal civil appellate studies show that appeals courts overturn jury verdicts more than benc...
The prevailing expert opinion is that jury verdicts are largely immune to appellate revision. Usin...
Employment-discrimination plaintiffs swim against the tide. Compared to the typical plaintiff, they ...
Every state provides appellate review of criminal judgments, yet little research examines which fact...
Two findings dominate prior empirical studies of federal civil appeals. First, appeals courts are mo...
Despite what Priest-Klein theory predicts, in earlier research on federal civil cases, Eisenberg fou...
U.S. Juries Grow Tougher on Plaintiffs in Lawsuits, the New York Times page-one headline reads. The...
Professor Shaffer maintains that the preservation of fair trial in civil cases requires an increased...
A recent study of appellate outcomes reveals that defendants succeed significantly more often than p...
In a recent set of articles, Professor Kevin Clermont and Professor Theodore Eisenberg advance the c...
Federal data sets covering district court and appellate court civil cases for cases terminating in f...
Prior federal and state civil appeals studies show that appeals courts overturn jury verdicts more t...
Multiple studies find that plaintiffs who lose at trial and subsequently appeal are less successful ...
Multiple studies find that plaintiffs who lose at trial and subsequently appeal are less successful ...
Professors Clermont and Eisenberg conducted a systematic analysis of appellate court behavior and re...
Prior federal civil appellate studies show that appeals courts overturn jury verdicts more than benc...
The prevailing expert opinion is that jury verdicts are largely immune to appellate revision. Usin...
Employment-discrimination plaintiffs swim against the tide. Compared to the typical plaintiff, they ...
Every state provides appellate review of criminal judgments, yet little research examines which fact...
Two findings dominate prior empirical studies of federal civil appeals. First, appeals courts are mo...
Despite what Priest-Klein theory predicts, in earlier research on federal civil cases, Eisenberg fou...
U.S. Juries Grow Tougher on Plaintiffs in Lawsuits, the New York Times page-one headline reads. The...
Professor Shaffer maintains that the preservation of fair trial in civil cases requires an increased...