Japanese and U.S. legal systems, despite surprisingly similar doctrine and outlook on matters of jurisdiction and judgments, often clash: jurisdictions overlap and judgments may go unrespected, while parallel proceedings persist. The current outlook for harmonization through a multilateral Hague convention of general scope is bleak. These two countries are, however, ideally situated to reach a highly feasible bilateral agreement that would provide a better tomorrow in which jurisdiction was allocated appropriately and judgments were respected accordingly
This article considers some of the current tactical and legal issues counsel must face in bringing t...
This comment is based on remarks at the Eighth Regional Meeting of the American Society of Internati...
The Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements enteredinto force in 28 Contracting Sta...
Japanese and U.S. legal systems, despite surprisingly similar doctrine and outlook on matters of jur...
Recent Japanese cases concerning international jurisdiction illustrate a convergence of two distinct...
The advanced countries and the Hague Conference have endeavored in vain to harmonize civil procedure...
The United States\u27 law of territorial jurisdiction in civil cases is a mess. Many commentators, h...
The Hague Convention attempts to harmonize bases of jurisdiction and make enforcement of foreign jud...
The Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act (CJPTA) codifies the substantive law of jurisdic...
This research was done against the background of the failure of the Hague negotiations for a ‘broad’...
Japanese Judicial Jurisdiction: Are Japanese Courts Catching Up With Americans? The Georgia Journal ...
This thesis will examine how legal systems deal with the phenomenon of multiple assumptions of juris...
The recently concluded Hague Convention on Choice of Courts Agreements is the culmination of over a ...
Territorial authority to adjudicate is the preeminent component of private international law. Empir...
The proposed Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters ...
This article considers some of the current tactical and legal issues counsel must face in bringing t...
This comment is based on remarks at the Eighth Regional Meeting of the American Society of Internati...
The Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements enteredinto force in 28 Contracting Sta...
Japanese and U.S. legal systems, despite surprisingly similar doctrine and outlook on matters of jur...
Recent Japanese cases concerning international jurisdiction illustrate a convergence of two distinct...
The advanced countries and the Hague Conference have endeavored in vain to harmonize civil procedure...
The United States\u27 law of territorial jurisdiction in civil cases is a mess. Many commentators, h...
The Hague Convention attempts to harmonize bases of jurisdiction and make enforcement of foreign jud...
The Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act (CJPTA) codifies the substantive law of jurisdic...
This research was done against the background of the failure of the Hague negotiations for a ‘broad’...
Japanese Judicial Jurisdiction: Are Japanese Courts Catching Up With Americans? The Georgia Journal ...
This thesis will examine how legal systems deal with the phenomenon of multiple assumptions of juris...
The recently concluded Hague Convention on Choice of Courts Agreements is the culmination of over a ...
Territorial authority to adjudicate is the preeminent component of private international law. Empir...
The proposed Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters ...
This article considers some of the current tactical and legal issues counsel must face in bringing t...
This comment is based on remarks at the Eighth Regional Meeting of the American Society of Internati...
The Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements enteredinto force in 28 Contracting Sta...