Add to ORKGpeer reviewedThis chapter outlines to what extent the EU damages Directive deviates from or takes into account the requirements of equivalence and effectiveness underlying the principle of national procedural autonomy in EU law. Arguing that the Directive constitutes an operationalisation of those principles, the chapter outlines the strengths and limits of this approach chosen by the EU legislature
This article examines how subsidiarity can limit the exercise of EU procedural criminal law competen...
While harmonization and convergence of national substantive laws are well advanced in the European U...
The rule of law in the EU is not only substantive and formal, it is also procedural. From the early ...
In my presentation, I touched upon the EU's proposed Damages Directive and its link to the principle...
This chapter examines the Damages Directive and the issue of competence allocation between the Union...
Is the procedural autonomy of EU Member State a myth or a reality? What should this concept be taken...
This paper focuses on the relationship between the so called ‘procedural autonomy’ of the Member St...
In this contribution I put forward the argument that (1) the application of the adjudicative princip...
The notion of a procedural autonomy reserved to the Member States has its roots in the Rewe and Come...
peer reviewedThis chapter addresses general principles of EU law concerning procedural justice. It d...
This presentation concerned my article on positive procedural obligations, published earlier on in t...
Examining Board: Professor Hans-Wolfgang Micklitz, European University Institute Professor Giorgio ...
Procedural autonomy is a term often misused when talking about the very real phenomenon “judicial su...
The seminar analyses the obligation of the Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure ef...
This decision by the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice is characterized by an unusual factual s...
This article examines how subsidiarity can limit the exercise of EU procedural criminal law competen...
While harmonization and convergence of national substantive laws are well advanced in the European U...
The rule of law in the EU is not only substantive and formal, it is also procedural. From the early ...
In my presentation, I touched upon the EU's proposed Damages Directive and its link to the principle...
This chapter examines the Damages Directive and the issue of competence allocation between the Union...
Is the procedural autonomy of EU Member State a myth or a reality? What should this concept be taken...
This paper focuses on the relationship between the so called ‘procedural autonomy’ of the Member St...
In this contribution I put forward the argument that (1) the application of the adjudicative princip...
The notion of a procedural autonomy reserved to the Member States has its roots in the Rewe and Come...
peer reviewedThis chapter addresses general principles of EU law concerning procedural justice. It d...
This presentation concerned my article on positive procedural obligations, published earlier on in t...
Examining Board: Professor Hans-Wolfgang Micklitz, European University Institute Professor Giorgio ...
Procedural autonomy is a term often misused when talking about the very real phenomenon “judicial su...
The seminar analyses the obligation of the Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure ef...
This decision by the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice is characterized by an unusual factual s...
This article examines how subsidiarity can limit the exercise of EU procedural criminal law competen...
While harmonization and convergence of national substantive laws are well advanced in the European U...
The rule of law in the EU is not only substantive and formal, it is also procedural. From the early ...