Add to ORKGhttp://www.csi.ensmp.fr/Items/WorkingPapers/Download/DLWP.php?wp=WP_CSI_018.pdfCSI WORKING PAPERS SERIES 018Describes two examples (in France and in the US) of replication of the Danish procedure of the consensus conference for public participation in nanotechnology, and argues that emphasis on the evaluation of the participatory procedure should not be made at the expense of richer analysis of the problematisation of public participation fostered by such policy instruments
The core of this thesis consists of developing a comprehensive empirical assessment on the legitimac...
English abstract: Chapter 1 of this volume discusses the mainly European methodological adaptation ...
International audiencePublic participation in science, technology, and innovation is a significant t...
Describes two examples (in France and in the US) of replication of the Danish procedure of the conse...
http://www.csi.ensmp.fr/Items/WorkingPapers/Download/DLWP.php?wp=WP_CSI_011.pdfCSI WORKING PAPERS SE...
This article draws attention to struggles inherent in discourse about the meaning of participation i...
This special issue of the CIPAST newsletter was prepared by Nicolas Baya Laffite at INRA/TSV. It pro...
In this paper, we examine two methods of public participation, namely consensus conference (conféren...
An examination of nanotechnology as a lens through which to study contemporary democracy in both the...
In participatory technology assessment (pTA), technical and nontechnical communities convene to shar...
In this article, we inquire into two contemporary participatory formats that seek to democratically ...
peer reviewedIn participatory technology assessment (pTA), technical and nontechnical communities co...
"Public engagement in science" is one of the buzzwords that, since 2000, has been used in nanotechno...
It is said that democratic societies should have democratic processes for making science and technol...
This paper suggests that if nanotechnologies are to contribute to sustainability, then involving the...
The core of this thesis consists of developing a comprehensive empirical assessment on the legitimac...
English abstract: Chapter 1 of this volume discusses the mainly European methodological adaptation ...
International audiencePublic participation in science, technology, and innovation is a significant t...
Describes two examples (in France and in the US) of replication of the Danish procedure of the conse...
http://www.csi.ensmp.fr/Items/WorkingPapers/Download/DLWP.php?wp=WP_CSI_011.pdfCSI WORKING PAPERS SE...
This article draws attention to struggles inherent in discourse about the meaning of participation i...
This special issue of the CIPAST newsletter was prepared by Nicolas Baya Laffite at INRA/TSV. It pro...
In this paper, we examine two methods of public participation, namely consensus conference (conféren...
An examination of nanotechnology as a lens through which to study contemporary democracy in both the...
In participatory technology assessment (pTA), technical and nontechnical communities convene to shar...
In this article, we inquire into two contemporary participatory formats that seek to democratically ...
peer reviewedIn participatory technology assessment (pTA), technical and nontechnical communities co...
"Public engagement in science" is one of the buzzwords that, since 2000, has been used in nanotechno...
It is said that democratic societies should have democratic processes for making science and technol...
This paper suggests that if nanotechnologies are to contribute to sustainability, then involving the...
The core of this thesis consists of developing a comprehensive empirical assessment on the legitimac...
English abstract: Chapter 1 of this volume discusses the mainly European methodological adaptation ...
International audiencePublic participation in science, technology, and innovation is a significant t...