Consider a revenue-maximizing seller who can sell an object to one of n potential buyers. Each buyer either has hard information about his valuation (i.e., evidence that cannot be forged) or is ignorant. The optimal mechanism is characterized. It turns out that more ignorance can increase the expected total surplus. Even when the buyers are ex ante symmetric, the object may be sold to a buyer who does not have the largest willingness-to-pay. Nevertheless, an additional buyer increases the expected total surplus in the symmetric case, whereas more competition can be harmful if there are ex ante asymmetries.hard information; mechanism design
International audienceConsider a seller with a single indivisible good facing a buyer whose willingn...
International audienceConsider a seller with a single indivisible good facing a buyer whose willingn...
We analyze a situation where a monopolist is selling an indivisible good to risk neutral buyers who ...
We consider a revenue maximizing seller who, before proposing a mechanism to sell her object(s), obs...
web.at.northwestern.edu/economics/zheng/. We consider auction environments where bidders must incur ...
Data buyers compete in a game of incomplete information about which a single data seller owns some p...
We consider a revenue-maximizing seller who, before proposing a mechanism to sell her object(s), ob...
We study a seller’s optimal mechanism for maximizing revenue when a buyer may present ev-idence rele...
We consider a revenue-maximizing seller who, before proposing a mechanism to sell her object(s), ob...
We analyze the situation where a monopolist is selling an indivisible good to risk neutral buyers wh...
We consider a setting where data buyers compete in a game of incomplete information, about which a d...
International audienceConsider a seller with a single indivisible good facing a buyer whose willingn...
International audienceConsider a seller with a single indivisible good facing a buyer whose willingn...
International audienceConsider a seller with a single indivisible good facing a buyer whose willingn...
International audienceConsider a seller with a single indivisible good facing a buyer whose willingn...
International audienceConsider a seller with a single indivisible good facing a buyer whose willingn...
International audienceConsider a seller with a single indivisible good facing a buyer whose willingn...
We analyze a situation where a monopolist is selling an indivisible good to risk neutral buyers who ...
We consider a revenue maximizing seller who, before proposing a mechanism to sell her object(s), obs...
web.at.northwestern.edu/economics/zheng/. We consider auction environments where bidders must incur ...
Data buyers compete in a game of incomplete information about which a single data seller owns some p...
We consider a revenue-maximizing seller who, before proposing a mechanism to sell her object(s), ob...
We study a seller’s optimal mechanism for maximizing revenue when a buyer may present ev-idence rele...
We consider a revenue-maximizing seller who, before proposing a mechanism to sell her object(s), ob...
We analyze the situation where a monopolist is selling an indivisible good to risk neutral buyers wh...
We consider a setting where data buyers compete in a game of incomplete information, about which a d...
International audienceConsider a seller with a single indivisible good facing a buyer whose willingn...
International audienceConsider a seller with a single indivisible good facing a buyer whose willingn...
International audienceConsider a seller with a single indivisible good facing a buyer whose willingn...
International audienceConsider a seller with a single indivisible good facing a buyer whose willingn...
International audienceConsider a seller with a single indivisible good facing a buyer whose willingn...
International audienceConsider a seller with a single indivisible good facing a buyer whose willingn...
We analyze a situation where a monopolist is selling an indivisible good to risk neutral buyers who ...