This short comment on Epstein's (2008) paper and on the response by Thompson and Derr argues that the symmetry between explanation and prediction cannot satisfactorily be discussed without making clear what prediction means - depending on which connotations the authors have with 'prediction' their arguments can or cannot be accepted.[No keywords]
Predictability evolves. The relation between our models and reality is one of similarity, not isomor...
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2000.Inc...
Many philosophers have argued that a hypothesis is better confirmed by some data if the hypothesis w...
One very significant characteristic of Hempel's covering-law models of scientific explanation, that ...
Can purely predictive models be useful in investigating causal systems? I argue ‘yes’. Moreover, in ...
Pessimists predict that future scientific theories will replace present scientific theories. However...
Predictivists use the no miracle argument to argue that ‘‘novel’’ predictions are decisive evidence ...
Being able to make correct novel predictions has long been trumpeted as one of the most important vi...
The paper presents a further articulation and defence of the view on prediction and accommodation th...
Should we insist on prediction, i.e. on correctly forecasting the future? Or can we rest content wit...
I propose an account of the speech act of prediction that denies that the contents of prediction mus...
Several authors have claimed that prediction is essentially impossible in the general theory of rela...
Predictability evolves. The relation between our models and reality is one of similarity, not isomor...
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2000.Inc...
Many philosophers have argued that a hypothesis is better confirmed by some data if the hypothesis w...
One very significant characteristic of Hempel's covering-law models of scientific explanation, that ...
Can purely predictive models be useful in investigating causal systems? I argue ‘yes’. Moreover, in ...
Pessimists predict that future scientific theories will replace present scientific theories. However...
Predictivists use the no miracle argument to argue that ‘‘novel’’ predictions are decisive evidence ...
Being able to make correct novel predictions has long been trumpeted as one of the most important vi...
The paper presents a further articulation and defence of the view on prediction and accommodation th...
Should we insist on prediction, i.e. on correctly forecasting the future? Or can we rest content wit...
I propose an account of the speech act of prediction that denies that the contents of prediction mus...
Several authors have claimed that prediction is essentially impossible in the general theory of rela...
Predictability evolves. The relation between our models and reality is one of similarity, not isomor...
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2000.Inc...
Many philosophers have argued that a hypothesis is better confirmed by some data if the hypothesis w...