[[alternative]]The Study on Management Efficiency of Hog-Market in Taiwan

[[abstract]] 本文研究以民國90年至91年之次級資料(台灣地區農產品批發市場年報)為主，以資料包絡分析法，探討台灣地區肉品市場經營效率，選擇涵蓋業務費用、管理費用、建地面積三項投入及拍賣收入、電宰及其他收入二項產出變數之產出導向之DEA 模式，求出台灣地區肉品市場之相對效率，並由此了解各項經營效率值之主要影響因子與衝擊程度，得到本文之結論以供管理者做為決策之參考。 研究結果顯示，90年度相對無效率之肉品市場為新竹縣和台南縣而91年度相對無效率之肉品市場為台南縣，至於需著重於投入項改善依序為業務費用、管理費用、建地面積，而產出項則依序為電宰費及其它收入、拍賣收入。 90年度之肉品市場相對有效率且穩定為：宜蘭縣、桃園縣、彰化縣、雲林縣、嘉義市；91年度之肉品市場相對有效率且穩定為宜蘭縣、桃園縣、彰化縣、台南市、岡山區、鳳山區、台東縣、花蓮縣等八處。 90年度以新竹縣、台南縣、台南市及91年度，新竹縣、大安區、嘉義縣、台南縣屬規模報酬遞減，管理者可以考慮降低規模。90年度大安區、台中市屬規模報酬遞增及91年度台中市屬規模報酬遞增，管理者可以考慮增加規模。[[abstract]] This article research was done in 2001-2002 in order to reach the inferiority data (based on the Taiwan terminal market of agricultural product’s report). According to the data envelopment analysis, the conference of management efficiency of hog-market in Taiwan choose to embrace three input of the business expenses, administrative expenses, establish square measure and auction income, and two variables output of other revenue and poulty processing revenue to lead into DEA mode, in order to request the hog-market in Taiwan in opposite to efficiency. In addition to more understand each item of management efficiency to reach the main factor of effect and charge extent. Moreover, this thesis conclusion can be the policy and reference for those managers. The research result shows in 2001’s the opposite of inefficiency of hog-market is in Hsin chu county and Tainan county. Then, in 2002's it is in Tainan County, which caused the demander put the improvement according to business expenses, administrative expenses, establish square measure, and output variable sequence are poulty processing expense ,other income and auction income. In 2001's, fixed areas of the opposite hog-markets are: I lan County, Taoyuan County, Chang hwa county, Yun lin county, and Chia yi city. Furthermore, in 2002 the fixed areas of these opposite hog markets are: I lan county, Taoyuan county, Chang hwa county, Tainan city, Kang mountain area, Feng shan district, Taitong county, Hua lien county and other eight locations. Moreover in 2001’s, the scope rewards have decreased progressively in Hsin chu county, and Tainan city. In 2002's it happened in Hsin chu county, Ta an district, Chia yi county, and Tainan county. So, the managers can consider reducing the scope. Furthermore, the scope rewards has increase progressively in Ta an district in 2001, and in Taichung city in 2002. Therefore, the managers can consider increasing the scope