[[alternative]]A Study on EU' Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development--The Case of Tajikistan

[[abstract]] 歐盟是世界上最大的人道救援捐助者，然而單從緊急人道救援方面著手，只能治標而無法治本。因此除了提供緊急援助外，該如何解決危機的源頭，儼然成為歐盟更應努力的方向。 歐盟強調較好的發展能夠減少緊急救援的需求，較好的緊急救援有助於發展，人道救援及發展援助之間必須有良好的連結，才能提升災民的能力，以應付危機的產生。此外，援助的目標並非只是回到之前的生活，而是希望提供人民更好的生活條件且能保護自己對抗周遭的風險，這也正是LRRD的核心概念。 本論文以LRRD概念之演進為出發點，首先介紹LRRD概念產生之背景及其內容，繼而認識歐盟之LRRD策略，並透過實例，瞭解LRRD的實際運作情況，最後進行歸納分析，檢討歐盟之LRRD及其所面臨的挑戰。[[abstract]] EU is the biggest contributor of humanitarian aid in the world. However, the humanitarian aid is not the real solution to the problems. It’s the root cause of the crises that EU needs to endeavor to solve. EU emphasizes that a better development can reduce the need of relief and a better relief would be a help to development. Therefore, the relief should link properly with development in order to promote the victims’ ability to handle the crises. Moreover, the target of the aid is not only lead to a return to normal life but to provide them better living conditions, so they can protect themselves against the risks. And this is the core concept of LRRD. This thesis starts from the evolution of LRRD. First, it introduces the background and the contents of LRRD, and then through the case of Tajikistan to understand the operation of LRRD. In the end, it reviews EU’ LRRD and finds the challenges that EU faces