We study a model with majority voting on redistribution in which agents differ in their skills and their preferences for leisure. Redistribution is generous and average labor supply low if the decisive voter has relatively strong preferences for leisure, while redistribution is limited and average labor supply high if the decisive voter has relatively weak preferences for leisure. Given differences in the preference distributions due to cultural differences or positive complementarities in leisure, our model thus provides an explanation for the substantial differences in redistribution and average working hours between the United States and continental Western Europe.
Following the report of the Stiglitz Commission, measuring and comparing well-being across countries...
There is growing evidence on the roles of fairness and social preferences as fundamental human motiv...
Despite the well-documented increase in the relative wages and expenditures of highly-educated indiv...
The starting point of this paper is to document considerable cross-country variation in the “labor w...
We endow individuals that differ in skill levels and tastes for working with altruistic preferences ...
Since 1950, the quantity of working hours has been decreasing over time both in the U.S. and in the ...
We examine the interactions between individual behavior, sentiments and the social contract in a mod...
The assumption that utility maximisation determines individual employment outcomes and labour suppl...
Whether observed differences in redistributive policies across countries are the result of differenc...
We examine the interactions between individual behavior, sentiments and the social contract in a mod...
I model the hypothesis that preferences evolve and permanent differences in individual attitudes tow...
Whether observed differences in redistributive policies across countries are the result o...
Abstract. This paper surveys models of voting on redistribution. Under reason-able assumptions, the ...
Following the report of the Stiglitz Commission, measuring and comparing well-being across countries...
To help explain differences between the US and EU “social contracts” as well as other cultural diffe...
Following the report of the Stiglitz Commission, measuring and comparing well-being across countries...
There is growing evidence on the roles of fairness and social preferences as fundamental human motiv...
Despite the well-documented increase in the relative wages and expenditures of highly-educated indiv...
The starting point of this paper is to document considerable cross-country variation in the “labor w...
We endow individuals that differ in skill levels and tastes for working with altruistic preferences ...
Since 1950, the quantity of working hours has been decreasing over time both in the U.S. and in the ...
We examine the interactions between individual behavior, sentiments and the social contract in a mod...
The assumption that utility maximisation determines individual employment outcomes and labour suppl...
Whether observed differences in redistributive policies across countries are the result of differenc...
We examine the interactions between individual behavior, sentiments and the social contract in a mod...
I model the hypothesis that preferences evolve and permanent differences in individual attitudes tow...
Whether observed differences in redistributive policies across countries are the result o...
Abstract. This paper surveys models of voting on redistribution. Under reason-able assumptions, the ...
Following the report of the Stiglitz Commission, measuring and comparing well-being across countries...
To help explain differences between the US and EU “social contracts” as well as other cultural diffe...
Following the report of the Stiglitz Commission, measuring and comparing well-being across countries...
There is growing evidence on the roles of fairness and social preferences as fundamental human motiv...
Despite the well-documented increase in the relative wages and expenditures of highly-educated indiv...