The law of multiple state responsibility is undeveloped. The scholarly literature is surprisingly devoid of reference to the circumstances or consequences of multiple state responsibility. Judicial or arbitral decisions addressing a state\u27s assertions that other states share responsibility are essentially unknown. Given this lack of attention to multiple state responsibility, it is not surprising that the issue of reparation in such circumstances has received even less attention. Yet, a mature system of international law must comprehend the responsibility of multiple state actors for a single event-including the responsible states\u27 duties of reparation
This is an essay in honour of Professor Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz, forming part of a collection of studie...
Throughout the years, international legal society has become increasingly interdependent. States and...
The international law of state responsibility determines when states are liable for international la...
Duality of responsibility in international law arises when the same conduct entails the internationa...
his paper explores the phenomenon of the sharing of international responsibilities among multiple ac...
After briefly summarizing the classical doctrine of state responsibility, Part One will discuss whet...
This paper will discuss the costs and benefits of sharing responsibility between states and internat...
This Article assesses the relation between State responsibility under international law and internat...
This chapter analyses whether nation states have a shared responsibility in international law to sec...
This is the second book in the series Shared Responsibility in International Law, which examines the...
At its fifty-third session (2001), the International Law Commission (ILC) finally adopted a complet...
There exists a range of situations where non-state actors and states can possibly share responsibili...
There exists a range of situations where non-state actors and states can possibly share responsibili...
In this article, I address the question of the grounds on which an international court that is asked...
The subjects’ responsibility for violations of their obligations is incident to any legal syst...
This is an essay in honour of Professor Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz, forming part of a collection of studie...
Throughout the years, international legal society has become increasingly interdependent. States and...
The international law of state responsibility determines when states are liable for international la...
Duality of responsibility in international law arises when the same conduct entails the internationa...
his paper explores the phenomenon of the sharing of international responsibilities among multiple ac...
After briefly summarizing the classical doctrine of state responsibility, Part One will discuss whet...
This paper will discuss the costs and benefits of sharing responsibility between states and internat...
This Article assesses the relation between State responsibility under international law and internat...
This chapter analyses whether nation states have a shared responsibility in international law to sec...
This is the second book in the series Shared Responsibility in International Law, which examines the...
At its fifty-third session (2001), the International Law Commission (ILC) finally adopted a complet...
There exists a range of situations where non-state actors and states can possibly share responsibili...
There exists a range of situations where non-state actors and states can possibly share responsibili...
In this article, I address the question of the grounds on which an international court that is asked...
The subjects’ responsibility for violations of their obligations is incident to any legal syst...
This is an essay in honour of Professor Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz, forming part of a collection of studie...
Throughout the years, international legal society has become increasingly interdependent. States and...
The international law of state responsibility determines when states are liable for international la...