Add to ORKGIn the United States and elsewhere, courts are confronting questions about where, and to whom, domestic rights extend. The resulting jurisprudence has sharpened the focus on who can assert claims based on a country\u27s domestic rights provisions, and why. Despite this judicial attention, the question of whether a country\u27s domestic rights regime constrains government action beyond national borders has largely escaped comparative scholarly analysis. This is so even though any inquiry into extraterritorial rights is outward-facing by its nature, and thus invites comparative inquiry
One consequence of the increasingly transnational nature of civil litigation is that U.S. courts mus...
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the United States Supreme Court have reached a fundamen...
The question of whether courts should consult the laws of other states has produced intense contro...
In the United States and elsewhere, courts are confronting questions about where, and to whom, domes...
There is increasing pressure for American courts to accept the decisions of foreign courts and inter...
For too long, state interests have dominated public jurisdiction and private choice-of-law analyses ...
Sovereign territory was bought and sold throughout much of American history, and there are good reas...
This Article argues that the functional test articulated in Boumediene v. Bush, which determines whe...
This article analyzes the domestic application of international human rights law from the standpoint...
Recent shifts in border enforcement policies raise pressing new questions about the extraterritorial...
U.S. judges, activists, and academics have theorized extensively about how the struggle for African ...
Following the attacks of September 11, 2001, the United States responded with military action aimed ...
The Constitution’s extraterritorial scope does not arise often in litigation. Two recent decisions b...
May the federal government require local governments to cooperate with the enforcement of immigratio...
This thesis points at two main issues in the concept of the universality of human rights. First, th...
One consequence of the increasingly transnational nature of civil litigation is that U.S. courts mus...
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the United States Supreme Court have reached a fundamen...
The question of whether courts should consult the laws of other states has produced intense contro...
In the United States and elsewhere, courts are confronting questions about where, and to whom, domes...
There is increasing pressure for American courts to accept the decisions of foreign courts and inter...
For too long, state interests have dominated public jurisdiction and private choice-of-law analyses ...
Sovereign territory was bought and sold throughout much of American history, and there are good reas...
This Article argues that the functional test articulated in Boumediene v. Bush, which determines whe...
This article analyzes the domestic application of international human rights law from the standpoint...
Recent shifts in border enforcement policies raise pressing new questions about the extraterritorial...
U.S. judges, activists, and academics have theorized extensively about how the struggle for African ...
Following the attacks of September 11, 2001, the United States responded with military action aimed ...
The Constitution’s extraterritorial scope does not arise often in litigation. Two recent decisions b...
May the federal government require local governments to cooperate with the enforcement of immigratio...
This thesis points at two main issues in the concept of the universality of human rights. First, th...
One consequence of the increasingly transnational nature of civil litigation is that U.S. courts mus...
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the United States Supreme Court have reached a fundamen...
The question of whether courts should consult the laws of other states has produced intense contro...