Add to ORKGAgencies continually interpret the statutes they administer. Their interpretations are expressed in a great variety of forms-in legislative regulations, adjudicatory opinions, manuals, court briefs, interpretive rules, policy statements, staff instructions, opinion letters, audits, correspondence, informal advice, guidelines, press releases, testimony before Congress, internal memoranda, speeches, explanatory statements in the Federal Register, and others
When decided, both Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984), and United Sta...
In this short symposium contribution, I take up this invitation to examine the relevance of the agen...
Given these recent shifts in the legal landscape, and considering that the judiciary’s role in revie...
The Supreme Court regularly reviews agency interpretations of statutes. For many years, the official...
Conventionally, when a statute delegates authority to an agency, courts defer to agency interpretati...
Judicial review of agency statutory interpretations depends heavily on the linguistic concept of amb...
Plurality decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court demand interpretation, especially because they tend ...
As the other pages of this journal reflect, writing about statutory interpretation commonly builds o...
In the debate over how federal courts should interpret federal statutes, faithful agent theories s...
After decades of debate, the lines of distinction between textualism and purposivism have been caref...
We live in an era of regulation, but our jurisprudence has fallen behind. Despite the central place ...
The framework for judicial review of administrative interpretations of regulatory statutes set forth...
The framework for judicial review of administrative interpretations of regulatory statutes set forth...
The framework for judicial review of administrative interpretations of regulatory statutes set forth...
In this essay, Pierce and Weiss report the results of a study of judicial review of agency interpret...
When decided, both Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984), and United Sta...
In this short symposium contribution, I take up this invitation to examine the relevance of the agen...
Given these recent shifts in the legal landscape, and considering that the judiciary’s role in revie...
The Supreme Court regularly reviews agency interpretations of statutes. For many years, the official...
Conventionally, when a statute delegates authority to an agency, courts defer to agency interpretati...
Judicial review of agency statutory interpretations depends heavily on the linguistic concept of amb...
Plurality decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court demand interpretation, especially because they tend ...
As the other pages of this journal reflect, writing about statutory interpretation commonly builds o...
In the debate over how federal courts should interpret federal statutes, faithful agent theories s...
After decades of debate, the lines of distinction between textualism and purposivism have been caref...
We live in an era of regulation, but our jurisprudence has fallen behind. Despite the central place ...
The framework for judicial review of administrative interpretations of regulatory statutes set forth...
The framework for judicial review of administrative interpretations of regulatory statutes set forth...
The framework for judicial review of administrative interpretations of regulatory statutes set forth...
In this essay, Pierce and Weiss report the results of a study of judicial review of agency interpret...
When decided, both Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984), and United Sta...
In this short symposium contribution, I take up this invitation to examine the relevance of the agen...
Given these recent shifts in the legal landscape, and considering that the judiciary’s role in revie...