Not unexpectedly, homophobic attitudes pervade judicial decisions denying rights to homosexuals. It is, however, somewhat confounding to detect degrading stereotypes about lesbians and gay men in decisions that purport to advance lesbian and gay rights. By way of example, a recent Virginia Court of Appeals decision, Bottoms v. Bottoms, was one that civil libertarians and commentators had hailed as a victory for homosexuals.\u27 That Bottoms case, however, was paradoxical. Although in Bottoms, the lesbian mother emerged triumphant with her child, the court of appeals nevertheless promoted certain damaging, outmoded notions about homosexuals
The Supreme Court decision in Mossop amounts to a postponement of, rather than a precedent on, the i...
Judicial Discretion and the Homosexual Parent: How Montana Courts Are and Should Be Considering a Pa...
As we think about the future role the judicial branch will play in our governance, we might consider...
Not unexpectedly, homophobic attitudes pervade judicial decisions denying rights to homosexuals. It ...
This Article traces and analyzes the series of legal and factual events leading up to the Virginia S...
In 1994, national media attention focused on the Virginia case Bottoms v. Bottoms, in which Kay Bott...
On May 20, 1996, the United States Supreme Court decided Romer v. Evans, a landmark decision support...
This Comment employs Price Waterhouse as a Looking Glass, to identify similar double binds that su...
Disputes in family law, particularly in child custody and access cases, often involve emotionally ch...
The custody determinations involving Lesbian mothers raise constitutional issues which must be exami...
This paper explores the significance of shifting cultural understandings of gay men and lesbians in ...
Divorce can be one of the most traumatic and stressful experiences a person will undergo in his or h...
When we think back to where the legal battle for gender equality and the rights of gay people stood ...
Courts have long struggled to resolve the question of how far a community may go in exercising its p...
This article surveys a very specific legal context: the claims of mothers, who are lesbians, in cust...
The Supreme Court decision in Mossop amounts to a postponement of, rather than a precedent on, the i...
Judicial Discretion and the Homosexual Parent: How Montana Courts Are and Should Be Considering a Pa...
As we think about the future role the judicial branch will play in our governance, we might consider...
Not unexpectedly, homophobic attitudes pervade judicial decisions denying rights to homosexuals. It ...
This Article traces and analyzes the series of legal and factual events leading up to the Virginia S...
In 1994, national media attention focused on the Virginia case Bottoms v. Bottoms, in which Kay Bott...
On May 20, 1996, the United States Supreme Court decided Romer v. Evans, a landmark decision support...
This Comment employs Price Waterhouse as a Looking Glass, to identify similar double binds that su...
Disputes in family law, particularly in child custody and access cases, often involve emotionally ch...
The custody determinations involving Lesbian mothers raise constitutional issues which must be exami...
This paper explores the significance of shifting cultural understandings of gay men and lesbians in ...
Divorce can be one of the most traumatic and stressful experiences a person will undergo in his or h...
When we think back to where the legal battle for gender equality and the rights of gay people stood ...
Courts have long struggled to resolve the question of how far a community may go in exercising its p...
This article surveys a very specific legal context: the claims of mothers, who are lesbians, in cust...
The Supreme Court decision in Mossop amounts to a postponement of, rather than a precedent on, the i...
Judicial Discretion and the Homosexual Parent: How Montana Courts Are and Should Be Considering a Pa...
As we think about the future role the judicial branch will play in our governance, we might consider...