Add to ORKGThe trial of Robert E. Chambers, Jr., for the murder of eighteen year old Jennifer Levin in Central Park in 1986, drew national attention to a deficiency in our system of expert testimony. The testimonies of the key experts on both sides conflicted on a central factual question. The jury was confronted with an evidentiary stalemate
The legal community has been debating the question of who should select and provide expert witnesses...
Read court decisions and commentaries from 100, or evenfive years ago, and you will find that expert...
Courts of last resort now seldom reverse a ruling on the competency of witnesses.\u27 Convinced, and...
In this article, I argue that the new focus on the risks of spurious expertise compels attention t...
In contrast with the legal systems of many other countries, the use of privately-retained experts is...
A trial court must find that the proponent of expert witness testimony has set forth adequate eviden...
The expert witness has been the subject of extensive recent commentary and legislative reform. The a...
Our real world outside the ivory towers of academia and the courts grows more and more complex. The ...
The dispute over whether litigants may use experts to run unexamined hearsay into the trial record i...
With regard to criminal cases, the focus of this Article, judges face significant challenges in ruli...
It does not take long for even a casual observer of criminal and civil trials to make two observatio...
This Note urges restoration of the proper balance of power between judges and juries regarding exper...
Debate concerning the limits of judicial power over expert witnesses remains active and in its early...
The article first summarizes the possible sources of error found in eyewitness testimony according t...
This article explores the ways in which experts can assist the jury to assess the credibility of oth...
The legal community has been debating the question of who should select and provide expert witnesses...
Read court decisions and commentaries from 100, or evenfive years ago, and you will find that expert...
Courts of last resort now seldom reverse a ruling on the competency of witnesses.\u27 Convinced, and...
In this article, I argue that the new focus on the risks of spurious expertise compels attention t...
In contrast with the legal systems of many other countries, the use of privately-retained experts is...
A trial court must find that the proponent of expert witness testimony has set forth adequate eviden...
The expert witness has been the subject of extensive recent commentary and legislative reform. The a...
Our real world outside the ivory towers of academia and the courts grows more and more complex. The ...
The dispute over whether litigants may use experts to run unexamined hearsay into the trial record i...
With regard to criminal cases, the focus of this Article, judges face significant challenges in ruli...
It does not take long for even a casual observer of criminal and civil trials to make two observatio...
This Note urges restoration of the proper balance of power between judges and juries regarding exper...
Debate concerning the limits of judicial power over expert witnesses remains active and in its early...
The article first summarizes the possible sources of error found in eyewitness testimony according t...
This article explores the ways in which experts can assist the jury to assess the credibility of oth...
The legal community has been debating the question of who should select and provide expert witnesses...
Read court decisions and commentaries from 100, or evenfive years ago, and you will find that expert...
Courts of last resort now seldom reverse a ruling on the competency of witnesses.\u27 Convinced, and...