Add to ORKGAs late as the eighteenth century, ordinary jury trial at common law was a judge-dominated, lawyer-free procedure conducted so rapidly that plea bargaining was unnecessary. Thereafter, the rise of adversary procedure and the law of evidence injected vast complexity into jury trial and made it unworkable as a routine dispositive procedure. A variety of factors, some quite fortuitous, inclined nineteenthcentury common law procedure to channel the mounting caseload into nontrial plea bargaining procedure rather than to refine its trial procedure as contemporary Continental legal systems were doing
This report on plea bargaining was written for the Academy for Justice, a collaborative research p...
George Fisher\u27s new book, Plea Bargaining\u27s Triumph, is really three books in one. The first p...
After four decades of neglecting laissez-faire plea bargaining, the Supreme Court got it right. In ...
As late as the eighteenth century, ordinary jury trial at common law was a judge-dominated, lawyer-f...
As late as the eighteenth century, ordinary jury trial at common law was a judge-dominated, lawyer-f...
Most criminal prosecutions are settled without a trial. The parties to these settlements trade vario...
Historically, guilty pleas have always been considered a way of rationalising criminal procedures. R...
The myth of American exceptionalism in the matter of plea-bargaining is certainly by now quite untru...
Plea bargaining in the United States is in critical respects unregulated, and a key reason is the ma...
The present Article demonstrates the error of this universalist theory of plea bargaining by showing...
A Review of Plea Bargaining: The Experiences of Prosecutors, Judges, and Defense Attorneys by Milto...
This symposium article responds to the question, what\u27s left of the law in the wake of ADR? The a...
In the spring of 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court decided two cases that threw the phenomena of plea bar...
This article defends plea bargaining and responds to a trend in the academic literature to evaluate ...
In two recent decisions, the United States Supreme Court moved further in the direction of at least ...
This report on plea bargaining was written for the Academy for Justice, a collaborative research p...
George Fisher\u27s new book, Plea Bargaining\u27s Triumph, is really three books in one. The first p...
After four decades of neglecting laissez-faire plea bargaining, the Supreme Court got it right. In ...
As late as the eighteenth century, ordinary jury trial at common law was a judge-dominated, lawyer-f...
As late as the eighteenth century, ordinary jury trial at common law was a judge-dominated, lawyer-f...
Most criminal prosecutions are settled without a trial. The parties to these settlements trade vario...
Historically, guilty pleas have always been considered a way of rationalising criminal procedures. R...
The myth of American exceptionalism in the matter of plea-bargaining is certainly by now quite untru...
Plea bargaining in the United States is in critical respects unregulated, and a key reason is the ma...
The present Article demonstrates the error of this universalist theory of plea bargaining by showing...
A Review of Plea Bargaining: The Experiences of Prosecutors, Judges, and Defense Attorneys by Milto...
This symposium article responds to the question, what\u27s left of the law in the wake of ADR? The a...
In the spring of 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court decided two cases that threw the phenomena of plea bar...
This article defends plea bargaining and responds to a trend in the academic literature to evaluate ...
In two recent decisions, the United States Supreme Court moved further in the direction of at least ...
This report on plea bargaining was written for the Academy for Justice, a collaborative research p...
George Fisher\u27s new book, Plea Bargaining\u27s Triumph, is really three books in one. The first p...
After four decades of neglecting laissez-faire plea bargaining, the Supreme Court got it right. In ...