The essays in this issue are often generous both in their interpretation of my book and their criticisms of it. I am extremely grateful to the authors for taking the time to work through a long and complex manuscript and for throwing enormous light on it. Rather than responding to particular objections raised in these papers, I take this opportunity to set out the major themes of the book, the motivation for them, and the aspiration that ties the work together
No less an authority than Milton Friedman has argued that improving the realism of assumptions in ec...
Professor Weinrib\u27s Causation and Wrongdoing is a very complicated and difficult paper, rich in i...
Law and economics’ initial success has been under threat for some time now. Why is that? How has thi...
The starting point of this Article is Richard Posner\u27s statement of regret (in 1975) that, in ter...
Many questions left unanswered in that class, and in torts literature generally, like the reason for...
Conversational literacy in neoclassical welfare economics is an apparent prerequisite to gainful emp...
The essays in this issue are often generous both in their interpretation of my book and their critic...
Stated most generally, the point I want to emphasize is that economic analysis of any issue does not...
Modern economic analysis owes too much to the conceit of Bentham and his followers in their arrogant...
William Landes and Richard Posner are two of the most prominent advocates of the theory that the com...
The paper considers the concept of legal liability and shows how pragmatist legal thinkers (1) resha...
The economic analysis of law has taken a decidedly normative turn, especially in the hands of its le...
This paper points to some limitations of law and economics as both an explanative and a normative th...
The article considers the concept of legal liability and shows how pragmatist legal thinkers (1) res...
A Review of Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness by Eugene Bardach and Rob...
No less an authority than Milton Friedman has argued that improving the realism of assumptions in ec...
Professor Weinrib\u27s Causation and Wrongdoing is a very complicated and difficult paper, rich in i...
Law and economics’ initial success has been under threat for some time now. Why is that? How has thi...
The starting point of this Article is Richard Posner\u27s statement of regret (in 1975) that, in ter...
Many questions left unanswered in that class, and in torts literature generally, like the reason for...
Conversational literacy in neoclassical welfare economics is an apparent prerequisite to gainful emp...
The essays in this issue are often generous both in their interpretation of my book and their critic...
Stated most generally, the point I want to emphasize is that economic analysis of any issue does not...
Modern economic analysis owes too much to the conceit of Bentham and his followers in their arrogant...
William Landes and Richard Posner are two of the most prominent advocates of the theory that the com...
The paper considers the concept of legal liability and shows how pragmatist legal thinkers (1) resha...
The economic analysis of law has taken a decidedly normative turn, especially in the hands of its le...
This paper points to some limitations of law and economics as both an explanative and a normative th...
The article considers the concept of legal liability and shows how pragmatist legal thinkers (1) res...
A Review of Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness by Eugene Bardach and Rob...
No less an authority than Milton Friedman has argued that improving the realism of assumptions in ec...
Professor Weinrib\u27s Causation and Wrongdoing is a very complicated and difficult paper, rich in i...
Law and economics’ initial success has been under threat for some time now. Why is that? How has thi...