Liability for nuisance is often imposed on the ground of defendant\u27s negligence or more grievous fault in causing it. The Restatement would impose strict liability only where the nuisance stems from abnormally dangerous activity on defendant\u27s part. But these concepts by no means cover the whole field. There are many instances of nuisance where liability is imposed though defendant has not been negligent (still less wanton) and where his activity is not abnormally dangerous
The Restatement of Torts defines negligence as conduct . . . which falls below the standard establi...
Nuisance law provides a remedy for activities that substantially interfere with the use and enjoymen...
In ‘The Wagon Mound’1 the Privy Council had to consider claims in public nuisance and negligence ari...
Liability for nuisance is often imposed on the ground of defendant\u27s negligence or more grievous ...
It is forty years since Professor Newark wrote despairingly of nuisance that “the subject as commonl...
Commentators have long characterized the law of nuisance as a muddled and confusing doctrine, limite...
Defendants were engaged in excavation work, which required the use of compressed air. The air was co...
The role of negligence and strict liability in environmental nuisance actions has been the subject o...
This Article advocates for a wider pleading use of the tort of nuisance—this, because of the unresol...
The vagueness of the concept of nuisance has resulted from the varying interpretations given it by t...
Tort law has, viewed through a long lens, moved generally from strict to fault-based liability. This...
Public nuisance has recently been dusted off as a potential source of legal redress for tobacco use,...
Public nuisance has always been defined in terms of the object of protection – the community, the pu...
A cornerstone of tort law in our Anglo-American system of jurisprudence is that liability is imposed...
Nuisance is a word, and a legal phenomenon, of vague and conflicting nature. It refers to a liabilit...
The Restatement of Torts defines negligence as conduct . . . which falls below the standard establi...
Nuisance law provides a remedy for activities that substantially interfere with the use and enjoymen...
In ‘The Wagon Mound’1 the Privy Council had to consider claims in public nuisance and negligence ari...
Liability for nuisance is often imposed on the ground of defendant\u27s negligence or more grievous ...
It is forty years since Professor Newark wrote despairingly of nuisance that “the subject as commonl...
Commentators have long characterized the law of nuisance as a muddled and confusing doctrine, limite...
Defendants were engaged in excavation work, which required the use of compressed air. The air was co...
The role of negligence and strict liability in environmental nuisance actions has been the subject o...
This Article advocates for a wider pleading use of the tort of nuisance—this, because of the unresol...
The vagueness of the concept of nuisance has resulted from the varying interpretations given it by t...
Tort law has, viewed through a long lens, moved generally from strict to fault-based liability. This...
Public nuisance has recently been dusted off as a potential source of legal redress for tobacco use,...
Public nuisance has always been defined in terms of the object of protection – the community, the pu...
A cornerstone of tort law in our Anglo-American system of jurisprudence is that liability is imposed...
Nuisance is a word, and a legal phenomenon, of vague and conflicting nature. It refers to a liabilit...
The Restatement of Torts defines negligence as conduct . . . which falls below the standard establi...
Nuisance law provides a remedy for activities that substantially interfere with the use and enjoymen...
In ‘The Wagon Mound’1 the Privy Council had to consider claims in public nuisance and negligence ari...