MR. CHAIRMAN AND DISTINGUISHED COLLEAGUES: In the note verbale of October 2, 1967, from its Permanent Representative to the United Nations, the United States Government indicated that it considered Articles 27 and 28 on the interpretation of treaties to lay down overly rigid and unnecessarily restricted requirements. It is the purpose of the amendment submitted by the United States Delegation in Document L. 156 to suggest a simple and easy way of eliminating these difficulties in Articles 27 and 28 and of re-establishing the authority and viability of a process of interpretation which has served the peoples of the world well for several centuries
In the relations between states interpretation of treaties is an everyday issue. When an agent of st...
The law of treaty interpretation aspires to unity. All treaties are formally subject to the same rul...
Restatement (Second) and Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law took notably different approac...
MR. CHAIRMAN AND DISTINGUISHED COLLEAGUES: In the note verbale of October 2, 1967, from its Permane...
In the practice of modern international law, if a certain understanding is advanced as the correct i...
The great defect, and tragedy, in the International Law Commission\u27s final recommendations about ...
This Article offers the first sustained interdisciplinary critique of international law’s ordinary m...
International trade law is overwhelmingly treaty-based. In the traditional sense of ‘sources of law’...
The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties has been applied by international legal scholars, inter...
The 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, regulating treaties between States, lies at the h...
This article looks to the first formulations of \u2018restrictive interpretation\u2019 to identify w...
This paper addresses treaty interpretation in the context of international organizations, with parti...
What role do the rules of interpretation in Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law o...
International treaties can be notoriously difficult to amend by formal procedures. They must neverth...
The Restatement (Second) and Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law took notably different...
In the relations between states interpretation of treaties is an everyday issue. When an agent of st...
The law of treaty interpretation aspires to unity. All treaties are formally subject to the same rul...
Restatement (Second) and Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law took notably different approac...
MR. CHAIRMAN AND DISTINGUISHED COLLEAGUES: In the note verbale of October 2, 1967, from its Permane...
In the practice of modern international law, if a certain understanding is advanced as the correct i...
The great defect, and tragedy, in the International Law Commission\u27s final recommendations about ...
This Article offers the first sustained interdisciplinary critique of international law’s ordinary m...
International trade law is overwhelmingly treaty-based. In the traditional sense of ‘sources of law’...
The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties has been applied by international legal scholars, inter...
The 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, regulating treaties between States, lies at the h...
This article looks to the first formulations of \u2018restrictive interpretation\u2019 to identify w...
This paper addresses treaty interpretation in the context of international organizations, with parti...
What role do the rules of interpretation in Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law o...
International treaties can be notoriously difficult to amend by formal procedures. They must neverth...
The Restatement (Second) and Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law took notably different...
In the relations between states interpretation of treaties is an everyday issue. When an agent of st...
The law of treaty interpretation aspires to unity. All treaties are formally subject to the same rul...
Restatement (Second) and Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law took notably different approac...