This article examines and analyzes the Glass-Steagall Act (the Act), which separates commercial banking from investment banking and concludes that the most plausible explanation for the passage of the Act derives from a theory that recognizes the role of special interest groups in influencing legislative outcomes. It follows ineluctably from the application of this theory to the Glass-Steagall Act that judges, when called upon to interpret the Act, will face a virtually insurmountable burden due to the vast dichotomy between the ostensible legislative intent and the actual motivations of Congress
In 1933, the Glass-Steagall Act created a complete divorcement between commercial and i...
The author addresses the issue of whether a bank loan participation is a security within the coverag...
Several banks have recently entered or announced their intention to enter the discount brokerage bus...
The Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 removed commercial banks from the securities underwriting business. T...
The demise of the Glass-Steagall Act was the result of affirmative policy decisions by federal regul...
This article (1) analyzes the traditional Glass-Steagall Act restrictions on banks and the leading c...
The financial crisis of 2007-2009 caused the most severe global economic downturn since the Great De...
The role of private enforcement of public law is an uneven one among financial regulators. Private l...
The Glass-Steagall Act was passed in 1933 in response to the failure of the banks following the Grea...
These are the goals of this article. In particular, this article analyzes the legislative history of...
This paper will focus on the difference between commercial and investment banking and the efforts to...
In this Article, the Securities Industry Association presents its perspectives on various legislativ...
The literature on judicial selection systems has given considerable attention to the role that polit...
This article finds that the financial regulatory agencies operate in an environment where regulatory...
The business of investment banking is trending toward one-stop shopping and globalization. This art...
In 1933, the Glass-Steagall Act created a complete divorcement between commercial and i...
The author addresses the issue of whether a bank loan participation is a security within the coverag...
Several banks have recently entered or announced their intention to enter the discount brokerage bus...
The Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 removed commercial banks from the securities underwriting business. T...
The demise of the Glass-Steagall Act was the result of affirmative policy decisions by federal regul...
This article (1) analyzes the traditional Glass-Steagall Act restrictions on banks and the leading c...
The financial crisis of 2007-2009 caused the most severe global economic downturn since the Great De...
The role of private enforcement of public law is an uneven one among financial regulators. Private l...
The Glass-Steagall Act was passed in 1933 in response to the failure of the banks following the Grea...
These are the goals of this article. In particular, this article analyzes the legislative history of...
This paper will focus on the difference between commercial and investment banking and the efforts to...
In this Article, the Securities Industry Association presents its perspectives on various legislativ...
The literature on judicial selection systems has given considerable attention to the role that polit...
This article finds that the financial regulatory agencies operate in an environment where regulatory...
The business of investment banking is trending toward one-stop shopping and globalization. This art...
In 1933, the Glass-Steagall Act created a complete divorcement between commercial and i...
The author addresses the issue of whether a bank loan participation is a security within the coverag...
Several banks have recently entered or announced their intention to enter the discount brokerage bus...