Between 1820 and 1850 American legal commentators became obsessed with whether legislatures should codify, either in whole or in part, the common law of the American states. Indeed, [a]lmost every law writer after 1825 felt compelled to include his views [on codification] in his works of whatever sort. The enormous literature that emerged from this period survives today to fascinate modern legal historians, who seem to have developed their own obsession for the codification issue. As Lawrence Friedman has said, The codification movement is one of the set pieces of American legal history. Charles M. Cook\u27s The American Codification Movement: A Study of Antebellum Legal Reform is the first comprehensive study of this period of legal ...
“A code, or not a code—that is the question!”. Many countries asked themselves that very question. I...
Professor Nelson\u27s Americanization of the Common Law records the conclusions of a mighty research...
Private law codification is not as indispensable to continental legal culture as standard legal hist...
Between 1820 and 1850 American legal commentators became obsessed with whether legislatures should c...
Between 1820 and 1850 American legal commentators became obsessed with whether legislatures should c...
Attempting to survey the entire sweep of the nineteenth-century American codification debate is well...
In the decades following the Civil War, the American legal profession engaged in a heated debate abo...
This article first critically examines and disputes the theses of Professors Gilmore and Friedman. ...
The transition from colony to nation involved difficult readjustments in the thinking and behavioral...
At the end of the nineteenth century, the American legal community engaged in an impassioned debate ...
The Article documents that the general failure of the nineteenth century movement to codify American...
In 1872, California moved to the forefront of American legal reform by becoming one of the first sta...
throughout the world. Legal scholars, however, have focused attention on the history of codification...
America 's experience with codification may be described schematically in three phases : conscious f...
That English law country which today most needs a codified private law which shall be uniform from o...
“A code, or not a code—that is the question!”. Many countries asked themselves that very question. I...
Professor Nelson\u27s Americanization of the Common Law records the conclusions of a mighty research...
Private law codification is not as indispensable to continental legal culture as standard legal hist...
Between 1820 and 1850 American legal commentators became obsessed with whether legislatures should c...
Between 1820 and 1850 American legal commentators became obsessed with whether legislatures should c...
Attempting to survey the entire sweep of the nineteenth-century American codification debate is well...
In the decades following the Civil War, the American legal profession engaged in a heated debate abo...
This article first critically examines and disputes the theses of Professors Gilmore and Friedman. ...
The transition from colony to nation involved difficult readjustments in the thinking and behavioral...
At the end of the nineteenth century, the American legal community engaged in an impassioned debate ...
The Article documents that the general failure of the nineteenth century movement to codify American...
In 1872, California moved to the forefront of American legal reform by becoming one of the first sta...
throughout the world. Legal scholars, however, have focused attention on the history of codification...
America 's experience with codification may be described schematically in three phases : conscious f...
That English law country which today most needs a codified private law which shall be uniform from o...
“A code, or not a code—that is the question!”. Many countries asked themselves that very question. I...
Professor Nelson\u27s Americanization of the Common Law records the conclusions of a mighty research...
Private law codification is not as indispensable to continental legal culture as standard legal hist...