Add to ORKGEnsuring “transparency in sentencing” and seeking to eliminate “unwarranted disparity in sentencing” were great sound bites. But they resulted in bad policy because federal sentencing is highly politicized and because the substance of what was made “transparent” is in large measure a set of inflexible, arbitrary, and sometimes bizarre sentencing rules
In this wide-ranging essay, Robinson, a former Commissioner of the United States Sentencing Commissi...
Why should a bank robber in California get a different sentence than a bank robber in Texas? This wa...
The inequities of sentences for criminal offenders present one of the great problems in the administ...
Ensuring “transparency in sentencing” and seeking to eliminate “unwarranted disparity in sentencing”...
The Federal Sentencing Guidelines were created with two broad goals in mind. One, of course, was to ...
The federal sentencing guidelines, which focus on offense based statistical consistency, had a rippl...
The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 sought to bring consistency, coherence, and accountability to a fe...
In 1984 the Sentencing Reform Act was passed, ending fully discretionary sentencing by judges and al...
In 1987, the Nation’s first attempt to standardize federal sentencing came in the form of the United...
For many years, the sentencing process of the criminal justice system sought to achieve four goals: ...
Sentencing commissions, administrative agencies charged to develop and promulgate standards for sent...
The federal sentencing guidelines have received sustained criticism from scholars, judges, and pract...
This Note will explore the rarely discussed consequences that result when courts of appeals freely i...
This Article recounts the rise and evolution of the uniformity ideal in federal sentencing, that is,...
In 1984, the Federal Sentencing Reform Act was signed into law. This act of reformation set a new st...
In this wide-ranging essay, Robinson, a former Commissioner of the United States Sentencing Commissi...
Why should a bank robber in California get a different sentence than a bank robber in Texas? This wa...
The inequities of sentences for criminal offenders present one of the great problems in the administ...
Ensuring “transparency in sentencing” and seeking to eliminate “unwarranted disparity in sentencing”...
The Federal Sentencing Guidelines were created with two broad goals in mind. One, of course, was to ...
The federal sentencing guidelines, which focus on offense based statistical consistency, had a rippl...
The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 sought to bring consistency, coherence, and accountability to a fe...
In 1984 the Sentencing Reform Act was passed, ending fully discretionary sentencing by judges and al...
In 1987, the Nation’s first attempt to standardize federal sentencing came in the form of the United...
For many years, the sentencing process of the criminal justice system sought to achieve four goals: ...
Sentencing commissions, administrative agencies charged to develop and promulgate standards for sent...
The federal sentencing guidelines have received sustained criticism from scholars, judges, and pract...
This Note will explore the rarely discussed consequences that result when courts of appeals freely i...
This Article recounts the rise and evolution of the uniformity ideal in federal sentencing, that is,...
In 1984, the Federal Sentencing Reform Act was signed into law. This act of reformation set a new st...
In this wide-ranging essay, Robinson, a former Commissioner of the United States Sentencing Commissi...
Why should a bank robber in California get a different sentence than a bank robber in Texas? This wa...
The inequities of sentences for criminal offenders present one of the great problems in the administ...