Institutional contexts influence the argumentative exchanges that occur in them. This paper examines the concept of argumentative activity type as an integration of institutional insights into the pragma-dialectical theory, aimed at depicting such influence. The integration is significant to the pursuit of an empirically adequate account of argumentative discourse. Activity types account for the institutional aims of the arguers and provide tools to trace the influence of these aims on the arguers’ attempt to balance between their dialectical and rhetorical aims, I argue
The study of argumentation is often considered to be part of the discipline called logic, more in pa...
The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argum...
Linguistic descriptions of (markers of) textual relations are not always immediately relevant for pr...
This paper discusses the ways in which argumentative discourse prototypically manifests itself. As a...
Van Eemeren and Houtlosser concentrate on the tension inherent in argumentative discourse between th...
This paper focuses on argumentation in a specific institutional context: debate in the European Parl...
International audienceResearch in argumentation has acknowledged the important role of discourse in ...
In this paper the authors give a brief overview of the theoretical background of their research proj...
Theoretical and procedural diverseness is a feature characterising the study of argumentation. The ...
To illustrate the development of argumentation theory, the paper traces the journey of the pragma-di...
The aim of this paper is to indicate how knowledge of the argumentative activity type of a political...
The paper outlines some institutional characteristics of Second Reading debates on public bills in t...
In relation to the task of making an expedient selection from the available loci within the topical ...
In this chapter van Eemeren, Garssen and Meuffels explore the possibilities of effectiveness researc...
This paper focuses on argumentation in a specific institutional context: debate in the European Parl...
The study of argumentation is often considered to be part of the discipline called logic, more in pa...
The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argum...
Linguistic descriptions of (markers of) textual relations are not always immediately relevant for pr...
This paper discusses the ways in which argumentative discourse prototypically manifests itself. As a...
Van Eemeren and Houtlosser concentrate on the tension inherent in argumentative discourse between th...
This paper focuses on argumentation in a specific institutional context: debate in the European Parl...
International audienceResearch in argumentation has acknowledged the important role of discourse in ...
In this paper the authors give a brief overview of the theoretical background of their research proj...
Theoretical and procedural diverseness is a feature characterising the study of argumentation. The ...
To illustrate the development of argumentation theory, the paper traces the journey of the pragma-di...
The aim of this paper is to indicate how knowledge of the argumentative activity type of a political...
The paper outlines some institutional characteristics of Second Reading debates on public bills in t...
In relation to the task of making an expedient selection from the available loci within the topical ...
In this chapter van Eemeren, Garssen and Meuffels explore the possibilities of effectiveness researc...
This paper focuses on argumentation in a specific institutional context: debate in the European Parl...
The study of argumentation is often considered to be part of the discipline called logic, more in pa...
The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argum...
Linguistic descriptions of (markers of) textual relations are not always immediately relevant for pr...