I give a pragma-dialectical reconstruction of the role of teleological-evaluative argumentation referring to goals and values in the justification of judicial decisions. I establish the role and place of this form of argumentation in complex forms of justification in which the argumentation interacts with other forms of legal argumentation. I will do this by integrating the insights from legal theory and legal philosophy into a pragma-dialectical framework for the analysis and evaluation of argumentation
In order to be able to evaluate argumentation supporting judicial decisions, certain norms of reason...
The author gives an analysis of the strategic manoeuvring in the justification of legal decisions fr...
Abstract: In legal theory, it is widely claimed that decisions in hard cases are based on weighing a...
I give a pragma-dialectical reconstruction of the role of teleological-evaluative argumentation refe...
In this contribution I discuss the role of pragmatic argumentation referring to consequences, goals ...
In law, the soundness of pragmatic argumentation in which a decision is defended by pointing to the ...
This paper addresses a specific form of argumentation, pragmatic argumentation, in which a certain a...
In this contribution I address the prototypical argumentative patterns in which pragmatic argumentat...
The fields of linguistic pragmatics and legal interpretation are deeply interrelated. The purpose of...
In this paper an attempt is made to apply the dialogical approach to modelling legal justification i...
In legal theory, it is widely claimed that decisions in hard cases are based on weighing and balanci...
In this contribution I identify prototypical patterns of symptomatic argumentation in the justificat...
ABSTRACT: Pragma-dialectical approaches to legal argumentation seem to be rather different from trad...
From a (pragma) dialectical point of view, the evaluation of argumentation includes consideration of...
Linguistic argumentation, using the meaning of the wording in a statutory norm, often plays an impor...
In order to be able to evaluate argumentation supporting judicial decisions, certain norms of reason...
The author gives an analysis of the strategic manoeuvring in the justification of legal decisions fr...
Abstract: In legal theory, it is widely claimed that decisions in hard cases are based on weighing a...
I give a pragma-dialectical reconstruction of the role of teleological-evaluative argumentation refe...
In this contribution I discuss the role of pragmatic argumentation referring to consequences, goals ...
In law, the soundness of pragmatic argumentation in which a decision is defended by pointing to the ...
This paper addresses a specific form of argumentation, pragmatic argumentation, in which a certain a...
In this contribution I address the prototypical argumentative patterns in which pragmatic argumentat...
The fields of linguistic pragmatics and legal interpretation are deeply interrelated. The purpose of...
In this paper an attempt is made to apply the dialogical approach to modelling legal justification i...
In legal theory, it is widely claimed that decisions in hard cases are based on weighing and balanci...
In this contribution I identify prototypical patterns of symptomatic argumentation in the justificat...
ABSTRACT: Pragma-dialectical approaches to legal argumentation seem to be rather different from trad...
From a (pragma) dialectical point of view, the evaluation of argumentation includes consideration of...
Linguistic argumentation, using the meaning of the wording in a statutory norm, often plays an impor...
In order to be able to evaluate argumentation supporting judicial decisions, certain norms of reason...
The author gives an analysis of the strategic manoeuvring in the justification of legal decisions fr...
Abstract: In legal theory, it is widely claimed that decisions in hard cases are based on weighing a...