Add to ORKGThe recent proliferation of rights claims within our moral and political debates poses a threat to our reasoning skills. Rights claims often represent bids to name common ground, and we risk harm to our reasoning skills when we attempt to address dissensus by searching for common ground
We describe and analyze an important cognitive obstacle in inter- and intra-community ar-gumentation...
Mary Ann Glendon maintains that the United States has created too many legal rights in the last two ...
Reasonable disagreement about rights is commonly thought to challenge the legitimacy of political li...
Judgments about right are normally circumscribed and balanced by other considerations but it is poss...
What is the rational foundation for the doctrine of universal human rights? Some philosophers, such ...
The paper examines the sense in which rights can be said to exist. We examine various approaches to ...
In this paper, I argue that the contemporary human rights literature would benefit from a shift in f...
This paper argues that the typical theory of human rights is both defective and misleading. It is mi...
Argumentation theory needs to develop a tightly reasoned normative code of reasonableness in argumen...
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve ...
The paper proposes a defeasible treatment of rights reasoning. First, I introduce a basic Hohfeldian...
When people are deprived of their property rights so that the state can build a highway, a school, o...
From early modernity, philosophers have engaged in skeptical discussions concerning knowledge of the...
The Bill of Rights occupies an ambiguous place in American society. Americans favor the Bill of Righ...
Objective A classic statement about rights talks in American politics argues they are a divisive for...
We describe and analyze an important cognitive obstacle in inter- and intra-community ar-gumentation...
Mary Ann Glendon maintains that the United States has created too many legal rights in the last two ...
Reasonable disagreement about rights is commonly thought to challenge the legitimacy of political li...
Judgments about right are normally circumscribed and balanced by other considerations but it is poss...
What is the rational foundation for the doctrine of universal human rights? Some philosophers, such ...
The paper examines the sense in which rights can be said to exist. We examine various approaches to ...
In this paper, I argue that the contemporary human rights literature would benefit from a shift in f...
This paper argues that the typical theory of human rights is both defective and misleading. It is mi...
Argumentation theory needs to develop a tightly reasoned normative code of reasonableness in argumen...
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve ...
The paper proposes a defeasible treatment of rights reasoning. First, I introduce a basic Hohfeldian...
When people are deprived of their property rights so that the state can build a highway, a school, o...
From early modernity, philosophers have engaged in skeptical discussions concerning knowledge of the...
The Bill of Rights occupies an ambiguous place in American society. Americans favor the Bill of Righ...
Objective A classic statement about rights talks in American politics argues they are a divisive for...
We describe and analyze an important cognitive obstacle in inter- and intra-community ar-gumentation...
Mary Ann Glendon maintains that the United States has created too many legal rights in the last two ...
Reasonable disagreement about rights is commonly thought to challenge the legitimacy of political li...