In this paper, I will look at the critiques that feminists have proposed to existing styles of argumentation. There are two prominent lines of feminist criticism of argumentation: the epistemic critique which argues that women were socialized to argue differently and the equity critique which asserts that argumentation is a patriarchal attempt to dominate one another, as such it is adversarial in nature. I will then discuss the alternatives feminists have proposed to traditional argumentation
The emergent field of cultural studies uses various critical-emancipatory frameworks to evaluate the...
This dissertation explores the relationship between gender and argumentation, complicating narrative...
This essay begins with a critique of the Critical-Logical model dominant in contemporary argumentati...
Feminists note an association of arguing with aggression and masculinity and question the necessity ...
In Chapter One, I discuss some of the characteristics and limitations associated with the traditiona...
This paper critically examines non-adversarial feminist argumentation model specifically within the ...
My paper is addressed to two related questions: What are the feminist issues concerning argument/arg...
Though a segment of feminists have questioned the combative, logical, objective nature of academic w...
Includes bibliographical references (pages 103-113)Feminists hold that patriarchal perspectives have...
The first part of this paper will look at how essential features of power and authority affect the c...
In this paper, I focus on the postmodern feminist criticism of reason. I argue that postmodern femin...
that the "Critical Thinking Industry " is antagonistic to women. Because the critical-logi...
The Platonic legacy of Western epistemology has been severely attacked for its dominant exclusivist ...
This essay argues that ideals of cooperation or adversariality in argumentation are not equally atta...
Abstract: This essay begins with a critique of the Critical-Logical model dominant in contem-porary ...
The emergent field of cultural studies uses various critical-emancipatory frameworks to evaluate the...
This dissertation explores the relationship between gender and argumentation, complicating narrative...
This essay begins with a critique of the Critical-Logical model dominant in contemporary argumentati...
Feminists note an association of arguing with aggression and masculinity and question the necessity ...
In Chapter One, I discuss some of the characteristics and limitations associated with the traditiona...
This paper critically examines non-adversarial feminist argumentation model specifically within the ...
My paper is addressed to two related questions: What are the feminist issues concerning argument/arg...
Though a segment of feminists have questioned the combative, logical, objective nature of academic w...
Includes bibliographical references (pages 103-113)Feminists hold that patriarchal perspectives have...
The first part of this paper will look at how essential features of power and authority affect the c...
In this paper, I focus on the postmodern feminist criticism of reason. I argue that postmodern femin...
that the "Critical Thinking Industry " is antagonistic to women. Because the critical-logi...
The Platonic legacy of Western epistemology has been severely attacked for its dominant exclusivist ...
This essay argues that ideals of cooperation or adversariality in argumentation are not equally atta...
Abstract: This essay begins with a critique of the Critical-Logical model dominant in contem-porary ...
The emergent field of cultural studies uses various critical-emancipatory frameworks to evaluate the...
This dissertation explores the relationship between gender and argumentation, complicating narrative...
This essay begins with a critique of the Critical-Logical model dominant in contemporary argumentati...