Design deliberation refers to the process of thoughtfully weighing options, before making a design decision. This process is strongly related to argumentation, not only because of the well-known relation between argumentation and deliberation, but also due to characteristics of the design process. However, no structural model of team design deliberation exists to guide designers’ practice. This paper checks the hypothesis of inter-dependence between argument structures and group decision-making struc-ture as expressed through prescribed deliberation stages
Since the 1970's we have created hypertext systems supporting Rittel's argumentative approach to des...
Models of deliberative dialogue are fundamental for developing autonomous systems that support human...
This paper reports an investigation into the verbal interaction between two experienced software des...
The early design stages are the most vital for the development of the design of a building project a...
The process of design is seen as the generation, transformation and communication of knowledge in th...
peer-reviewedThe focus of this research is to explore how consensus is reached amongst teams during ...
In the context of research aspiring to better understanding of the design process, the activity of i...
Complex engineering projects comprise many individual design decisions. As these decisions are made ...
peer-reviewedPurpose - The purpose of this article is to explore the conversation activities of desi...
Decision making in design requires careful consideration, as any inaccuracies or faults can have ser...
Reasoning is argumentative and is at the core of design activity and thinking. Understanding the inf...
I investigated how designers and stakeholders interact during interdisciplinary collaborative design...
International audienceIn the context of market globalization, companies are now collaborating; concu...
Argumentation theory can encode an agent’s assessment of the state of an exchange of points of view....
Our work characterizes the argumentative process by which designers having different expertise inter...
Since the 1970's we have created hypertext systems supporting Rittel's argumentative approach to des...
Models of deliberative dialogue are fundamental for developing autonomous systems that support human...
This paper reports an investigation into the verbal interaction between two experienced software des...
The early design stages are the most vital for the development of the design of a building project a...
The process of design is seen as the generation, transformation and communication of knowledge in th...
peer-reviewedThe focus of this research is to explore how consensus is reached amongst teams during ...
In the context of research aspiring to better understanding of the design process, the activity of i...
Complex engineering projects comprise many individual design decisions. As these decisions are made ...
peer-reviewedPurpose - The purpose of this article is to explore the conversation activities of desi...
Decision making in design requires careful consideration, as any inaccuracies or faults can have ser...
Reasoning is argumentative and is at the core of design activity and thinking. Understanding the inf...
I investigated how designers and stakeholders interact during interdisciplinary collaborative design...
International audienceIn the context of market globalization, companies are now collaborating; concu...
Argumentation theory can encode an agent’s assessment of the state of an exchange of points of view....
Our work characterizes the argumentative process by which designers having different expertise inter...
Since the 1970's we have created hypertext systems supporting Rittel's argumentative approach to des...
Models of deliberative dialogue are fundamental for developing autonomous systems that support human...
This paper reports an investigation into the verbal interaction between two experienced software des...