Add to ORKGIn “Are conductive arguments possible?” Jonathan Adler argued that conductive argu-ments (those balancing considerations for a claim, C, against counter-considerations against C) are not possible because they are committed to two incompatible propositions: (I) C is reached without nullifying the counter-considerations; (II) C is accepted is true, which issues in belief, so C is detached from these premises. This paper offers an analysis and an assessment of Adler’s case for his thesis
This commentary presents the view that "conductive argument" is an argumentation structure rather th...
Edited by J. Anthony Blair and Ralph H. Johnson King’s College London, UK: College Publications, 2...
Abstract: Beginning with a review of the work of Carl Wellman and Trudy Govier on conductive argumen...
The paper aims to provide an analysis and critique of Carl Wellman’s account of conduction presented...
I will demonstrate that conductive arguments are found in the inference to the best explana-tion as ...
Conductive arguments, as a separate category of reasoning, has experienced a revival. In 2010, the ...
Conductive argumentsThe term “conduction” introduced by Wellman in 1971 is almost absent...
The topic of conductive argument has attracted much attention in recent argumentation studies, but m...
The concept of conductive argument weight was developed by Carl Wellman and later by Trudy Govier. T...
I argue that conductions are a special type of inference indeed, but that this does not mean that we...
This paper examines arguments that take counterconsiderations into account, and it does so from a di...
From a critical rationalist perspective, I look at a fragment of the debate on shale gas exploration...
When Carl Wellman (1971) introduced the reasoning-type conduction, he endorsed a dialectical view on...
I argue that conductions are a special type of inference indeed, but that this does not mean that we...
In pro and con arguments, an arguer acknowledges that there are points against the conclu-sion reach...
This commentary presents the view that "conductive argument" is an argumentation structure rather th...
Edited by J. Anthony Blair and Ralph H. Johnson King’s College London, UK: College Publications, 2...
Abstract: Beginning with a review of the work of Carl Wellman and Trudy Govier on conductive argumen...
The paper aims to provide an analysis and critique of Carl Wellman’s account of conduction presented...
I will demonstrate that conductive arguments are found in the inference to the best explana-tion as ...
Conductive arguments, as a separate category of reasoning, has experienced a revival. In 2010, the ...
Conductive argumentsThe term “conduction” introduced by Wellman in 1971 is almost absent...
The topic of conductive argument has attracted much attention in recent argumentation studies, but m...
The concept of conductive argument weight was developed by Carl Wellman and later by Trudy Govier. T...
I argue that conductions are a special type of inference indeed, but that this does not mean that we...
This paper examines arguments that take counterconsiderations into account, and it does so from a di...
From a critical rationalist perspective, I look at a fragment of the debate on shale gas exploration...
When Carl Wellman (1971) introduced the reasoning-type conduction, he endorsed a dialectical view on...
I argue that conductions are a special type of inference indeed, but that this does not mean that we...
In pro and con arguments, an arguer acknowledges that there are points against the conclu-sion reach...
This commentary presents the view that "conductive argument" is an argumentation structure rather th...
Edited by J. Anthony Blair and Ralph H. Johnson King’s College London, UK: College Publications, 2...
Abstract: Beginning with a review of the work of Carl Wellman and Trudy Govier on conductive argumen...