This paper examines whether philosophers of argument, in spite of their disavowing ‘timeless principles’, nevertheless embrace a set of principles, or axioms, to underlie argumentation theory. First, it reviews the thinking of some prominent philosophers of argument; second, it extracts some principles common to their philosophies; and third, it draws out possible consequences for argumentation theory and asks whether such theory has an underlying political posture
Starting from Sperber and Mercier’s theory (2011) on the relationship between reasoning and arguing,...
In the paper I want to give a new account of notions of reasoning, argumentation, and persuasion. Th...
International audienceThis paper aims at laying some foundations of a logic of argumentation in whic...
The paper argues that argument and argumentation deserve philosophical attention but do not receive ...
The author holds that the old theory according to which philosophy is the matrix of argumentation st...
This chapter discusses how formal models of argumentation can clarify philosophical problems and iss...
Argumentation theory has become an important topic in the field of AI. The basic idea is to construc...
Argumentations are at the heart of the deductive and the hypothetico-deductive methods, which are in...
The paper\u27s two theses are: First, that the historical and philosophical roots of argumentation a...
To find the place of Argumentation (argumentation theory) in education one must sort out its relatio...
If dialogue is a necessary condition for argument, argumentation in oratory becomes questionable, si...
When are we, in fact, arguing? Even one and the same author may offer more than one definition of wh...
This paper aims at laying some foundations of a logic of argumentation in which arguments, as well a...
Starting from Sperber and Mercier’s theory (2011) on the relationship between reasoning and arguing,...
In the paper I want to give a new account of notions of reasoning, argumentation, and persuasion. Th...
International audienceThis paper aims at laying some foundations of a logic of argumentation in whic...
The paper argues that argument and argumentation deserve philosophical attention but do not receive ...
The author holds that the old theory according to which philosophy is the matrix of argumentation st...
This chapter discusses how formal models of argumentation can clarify philosophical problems and iss...
Argumentation theory has become an important topic in the field of AI. The basic idea is to construc...
Argumentations are at the heart of the deductive and the hypothetico-deductive methods, which are in...
The paper\u27s two theses are: First, that the historical and philosophical roots of argumentation a...
To find the place of Argumentation (argumentation theory) in education one must sort out its relatio...
If dialogue is a necessary condition for argument, argumentation in oratory becomes questionable, si...
When are we, in fact, arguing? Even one and the same author may offer more than one definition of wh...
This paper aims at laying some foundations of a logic of argumentation in which arguments, as well a...
Starting from Sperber and Mercier’s theory (2011) on the relationship between reasoning and arguing,...
In the paper I want to give a new account of notions of reasoning, argumentation, and persuasion. Th...
International audienceThis paper aims at laying some foundations of a logic of argumentation in whic...