Add to ORKGThe paper aims to provide an analysis and critique of Carl Wellman’s account of conduction presented in Challenge and Response and Morals and Ethics. It considers several issues, including: reason-ing vs. argument, the definition vs. the three patterns of conduction, pro and con arguments as dialogues, their assessment, the concept of validity, applications beyond moral arguments, argument type vs. as crite-rion of evaluation
I argue that conductions are a special type of inference indeed, but that this does not mean that we...
This commentary presents the view that "conductive argument" is an argumentation structure rather th...
This paper examines arguments that take counterconsiderations into account, and it does so from a di...
In “Are conductive arguments possible?” Jonathan Adler argued that conductive argu-ments (those bala...
I will demonstrate that conductive arguments are found in the inference to the best explana-tion as ...
When Carl Wellman (1971) introduced the reasoning-type conduction, he endorsed a dialectical view on...
Conductive argumentsThe term “conduction” introduced by Wellman in 1971 is almost absent...
I argue that conductions are a special type of inference indeed, but that this does not mean that we...
Carl Wellman (1971) introduced the reasoning-type conduction while en-dorsing a dialectical view on ...
The topic of conductive argument has attracted much attention in recent argumentation studies, but m...
Conductive arguments, as a separate category of reasoning, has experienced a revival. In 2010, the ...
In this paper I compare and contrast Rawls’s notion of reflective equilibrium with Wellman‘s notion ...
The concept of conductive argument weight was developed by Carl Wellman and later by Trudy Govier. T...
From a critical rationalist perspective, I look at a fragment of the debate on shale gas exploration...
Abstract: Beginning with a review of the work of Carl Wellman and Trudy Govier on conductive argumen...
I argue that conductions are a special type of inference indeed, but that this does not mean that we...
This commentary presents the view that "conductive argument" is an argumentation structure rather th...
This paper examines arguments that take counterconsiderations into account, and it does so from a di...
In “Are conductive arguments possible?” Jonathan Adler argued that conductive argu-ments (those bala...
I will demonstrate that conductive arguments are found in the inference to the best explana-tion as ...
When Carl Wellman (1971) introduced the reasoning-type conduction, he endorsed a dialectical view on...
Conductive argumentsThe term “conduction” introduced by Wellman in 1971 is almost absent...
I argue that conductions are a special type of inference indeed, but that this does not mean that we...
Carl Wellman (1971) introduced the reasoning-type conduction while en-dorsing a dialectical view on ...
The topic of conductive argument has attracted much attention in recent argumentation studies, but m...
Conductive arguments, as a separate category of reasoning, has experienced a revival. In 2010, the ...
In this paper I compare and contrast Rawls’s notion of reflective equilibrium with Wellman‘s notion ...
The concept of conductive argument weight was developed by Carl Wellman and later by Trudy Govier. T...
From a critical rationalist perspective, I look at a fragment of the debate on shale gas exploration...
Abstract: Beginning with a review of the work of Carl Wellman and Trudy Govier on conductive argumen...
I argue that conductions are a special type of inference indeed, but that this does not mean that we...
This commentary presents the view that "conductive argument" is an argumentation structure rather th...
This paper examines arguments that take counterconsiderations into account, and it does so from a di...