Add to ORKGI will demonstrate that conductive arguments are found in the inference to the best explana-tion as it is used in science. Conductive arguments, I argue, operate on two levels: the first is in the con-struction of hypotheses; the second is through the competition of hypotheses. By constructing arguments based on observations of facts, all possible (conceivable) factors are taken into account and a judgment is made based on our weighing of considerations: conductive argumentation
This commentary presents the view that "conductive argument" is an argumentation structure rather th...
In this paper I compare and contrast Rawls’s notion of reflective equilibrium with Wellman‘s notion ...
This paper examines arguments that take counterconsiderations into account, and it does so from a di...
Conductive arguments, as a separate category of reasoning, has experienced a revival. In 2010, the ...
The paper aims to provide an analysis and critique of Carl Wellman’s account of conduction presented...
Conductive argumentsThe term “conduction” introduced by Wellman in 1971 is almost absent...
In “Are conductive arguments possible?” Jonathan Adler argued that conductive argu-ments (those bala...
The topic of conductive argument has attracted much attention in recent argumentation studies, but m...
I argue that conductions are a special type of inference indeed, but that this does not mean that we...
The concept of conductive argument weight was developed by Carl Wellman and later by Trudy Govier. T...
I argue that conductions are a special type of inference indeed, but that this does not mean that we...
When Carl Wellman (1971) introduced the reasoning-type conduction, he endorsed a dialectical view on...
From a critical rationalist perspective, I look at a fragment of the debate on shale gas exploration...
In pro and con arguments, an arguer acknowledges that there are points against the conclu-sion reach...
Carl Wellman (1971) introduced the reasoning-type conduction while en-dorsing a dialectical view on ...
This commentary presents the view that "conductive argument" is an argumentation structure rather th...
In this paper I compare and contrast Rawls’s notion of reflective equilibrium with Wellman‘s notion ...
This paper examines arguments that take counterconsiderations into account, and it does so from a di...
Conductive arguments, as a separate category of reasoning, has experienced a revival. In 2010, the ...
The paper aims to provide an analysis and critique of Carl Wellman’s account of conduction presented...
Conductive argumentsThe term “conduction” introduced by Wellman in 1971 is almost absent...
In “Are conductive arguments possible?” Jonathan Adler argued that conductive argu-ments (those bala...
The topic of conductive argument has attracted much attention in recent argumentation studies, but m...
I argue that conductions are a special type of inference indeed, but that this does not mean that we...
The concept of conductive argument weight was developed by Carl Wellman and later by Trudy Govier. T...
I argue that conductions are a special type of inference indeed, but that this does not mean that we...
When Carl Wellman (1971) introduced the reasoning-type conduction, he endorsed a dialectical view on...
From a critical rationalist perspective, I look at a fragment of the debate on shale gas exploration...
In pro and con arguments, an arguer acknowledges that there are points against the conclu-sion reach...
Carl Wellman (1971) introduced the reasoning-type conduction while en-dorsing a dialectical view on ...
This commentary presents the view that "conductive argument" is an argumentation structure rather th...
In this paper I compare and contrast Rawls’s notion of reflective equilibrium with Wellman‘s notion ...
This paper examines arguments that take counterconsiderations into account, and it does so from a di...