We describe and analyze an important cognitive obstacle in inter- and intra-community ar-gumentation processes, which we propose to call \u27Cognitive Systemic Dichotomization\u27 (CSD). This social phenomenon consists in the collective use of shared cognitive patterns based upon dichotomous schemati-zation of knowledge, values, and affection. We discuss the formative role of CSD on a community’s collec-tive cognition, identity, and public discourse, as well as the challenges it raises to reasoned argumentation, and how different approaches to argumentation undertake to face this obstacle to the reasonable debate of issues of public concern
Assessing student interactions during socio-scientific debates requires an interdisciplinary theoret...
The shocking statement made by Robert Fogelin over 20 years ago when he claimed that discourses that...
The contemporary debate on democracy shows two points of view: the “deliberative” one and the “agon...
Argumentation theory needs to develop a tightly reasoned normative code of reasonableness in argumen...
This paper presents an analysis of stasis as a means for creating common ground between conflicting ...
This dissertation inquires into the nature of dissociation – a maneuver through which a single entit...
“Reasonable hostility” is a norm of communicative conduct initially developed by studying public exc...
Social controversy is a sustained, mediated debate between at least two oppositional parties which i...
This paper addresses the appraisal of the quality of student debate about a socio-scientific issue, ...
Rather than the art of putting forward logically valid arguments leading to Truth, argumentation is ...
This article proposes a way of connecting two levels at which scholars have studied discursive pract...
Public scientific controversies are often the enemy of deliberation, because debating and winning ta...
Recent democracy theorists unanimously agree with the importance of citizens\u27 discursive activiti...
This article gives an account of experimental research conducted in France with focus groups on deli...
One of Mill’s main arguments for free speech springs from taking disagreement as an epistemically va...
Assessing student interactions during socio-scientific debates requires an interdisciplinary theoret...
The shocking statement made by Robert Fogelin over 20 years ago when he claimed that discourses that...
The contemporary debate on democracy shows two points of view: the “deliberative” one and the “agon...
Argumentation theory needs to develop a tightly reasoned normative code of reasonableness in argumen...
This paper presents an analysis of stasis as a means for creating common ground between conflicting ...
This dissertation inquires into the nature of dissociation – a maneuver through which a single entit...
“Reasonable hostility” is a norm of communicative conduct initially developed by studying public exc...
Social controversy is a sustained, mediated debate between at least two oppositional parties which i...
This paper addresses the appraisal of the quality of student debate about a socio-scientific issue, ...
Rather than the art of putting forward logically valid arguments leading to Truth, argumentation is ...
This article proposes a way of connecting two levels at which scholars have studied discursive pract...
Public scientific controversies are often the enemy of deliberation, because debating and winning ta...
Recent democracy theorists unanimously agree with the importance of citizens\u27 discursive activiti...
This article gives an account of experimental research conducted in France with focus groups on deli...
One of Mill’s main arguments for free speech springs from taking disagreement as an epistemically va...
Assessing student interactions during socio-scientific debates requires an interdisciplinary theoret...
The shocking statement made by Robert Fogelin over 20 years ago when he claimed that discourses that...
The contemporary debate on democracy shows two points of view: the “deliberative” one and the “agon...