Add to ORKGThis paper is an in depth discussion of the work on fallacies collected in the Selected Papers of Woods and Walton. While it defends many of their claims, it argues that they have not shown that their formal approach should be an integral part of that discipline we now call informal logic
The study of fallacies is at the heart of argumentation studies. In response to Hamblin’s devastatin...
The history of fallacy theory is long, distinguished and, admittedly, checkered. I offer a bird eye ...
In this paper I claim that the reason we are reluctant to call many informal fallacies fallacies of ...
Historically, the fallacies have been neglected as objects of systematic study. Yet, since Hamblin's...
logicism; Lowenheim-Skolem theorem; neo-pythagoreanism; pragma-dialectic; reductionism; Stone repres...
This book is a sequel to the classic work, Fallacies Selected Papers 1972 - 1982 (1989), coauthored ...
This paper argues that recent theoretical attempts to understand fallacious reasoning fail because t...
Hamblin’s Fallacies remains one of the crucial documents in the development of informal logic and ar...
The distinction between formal and informal logic is clarified as a prelude to considering their ide...
We are pleased to release this edition of Ralph Johnson’s The Rise of Informal Logic as Volume 2 in ...
Woods and Walton deserve credit for including (in all editions of their textbook Argument) a discuss...
The paper critically investigates the pragma-dialectics of van Eemeren and Grootendorst, particularl...
Fallacy theory has not been my particular concern until now – even if I spoke here and there about f...
In this paper, an analysis is given of the straw man fallacy as a misrepresentation of someone'...
Fallacy theory has three significant challenges to it: the generality, scope, and negativity problem...
The study of fallacies is at the heart of argumentation studies. In response to Hamblin’s devastatin...
The history of fallacy theory is long, distinguished and, admittedly, checkered. I offer a bird eye ...
In this paper I claim that the reason we are reluctant to call many informal fallacies fallacies of ...
Historically, the fallacies have been neglected as objects of systematic study. Yet, since Hamblin's...
logicism; Lowenheim-Skolem theorem; neo-pythagoreanism; pragma-dialectic; reductionism; Stone repres...
This book is a sequel to the classic work, Fallacies Selected Papers 1972 - 1982 (1989), coauthored ...
This paper argues that recent theoretical attempts to understand fallacious reasoning fail because t...
Hamblin’s Fallacies remains one of the crucial documents in the development of informal logic and ar...
The distinction between formal and informal logic is clarified as a prelude to considering their ide...
We are pleased to release this edition of Ralph Johnson’s The Rise of Informal Logic as Volume 2 in ...
Woods and Walton deserve credit for including (in all editions of their textbook Argument) a discuss...
The paper critically investigates the pragma-dialectics of van Eemeren and Grootendorst, particularl...
Fallacy theory has not been my particular concern until now – even if I spoke here and there about f...
In this paper, an analysis is given of the straw man fallacy as a misrepresentation of someone'...
Fallacy theory has three significant challenges to it: the generality, scope, and negativity problem...
The study of fallacies is at the heart of argumentation studies. In response to Hamblin’s devastatin...
The history of fallacy theory is long, distinguished and, admittedly, checkered. I offer a bird eye ...
In this paper I claim that the reason we are reluctant to call many informal fallacies fallacies of ...